SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knight who wrote (28975)7/27/2000 1:02:40 AM
From: kumar  Respond to of 54805
 
I posed this question with the royalty costs as a secondary item, compared to the ability of someone else coming out with more efficient/better chips with the same IPR (licensed or owned).

subsequent discussions here have me thinking favorably about the phrase "xyz is licenced to use QCOM+SPINCO patents". key phrase there being "licensed to use" ie. not "licensed to modify..."

that changes the scenario big time.

cheers, kumar


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News