Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StocksDATsoar who wrote (56604)	7/27/2000 9:12:52 AM
From: myturn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 150070

I don't know how these forward splits pan out on a OTC. I haven't followed one that closely on the OTC. But nine times out of ten; if there is a large short position in a stock the MMs will cover after the split forcing the stock to run up. That is what happened with RMBS. SSCP was the first forward split that made sense to me. OS of only 3 million. Real company with real product. You have yourself a winner here. Congrats! I would not sell till the split plays out. I will be buying and buying right after the split forcing the MMs hands. There will now only be 45 million. I believe it will ge a gap up the day after the split and it will run up from there. I just wish I would have bought more than 5k. Cheers RG

To: StocksDATsoar who wrote (56604)	7/27/2000 10:02:51 AM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 150070

www.otcnn.com/headlines.html?id=964700700 SEC Proposes New Rule To Expose MM Activity By Jack Burney Published by OTCNN.com 07/27/2000 07:25 AM CST All the letters and e-mails must have had an effect, because the Securities & Exchange Commission is proposing a new two-part rule that would virtually end Market Maker Manipulation. The rule would (1) Make brokers reveal which market maker they use to execute buy or sell orders for investors, and (2) Force market makers to post monthly reports that expose whether trades are being made at the best available price. Such a rule would subject any attempt at MM manipulation or excessive shorting to the light of public scrutiny, and, in effect, bring an end to the worst of the scourge that has suppressed stock prices, according to their stockholders, since March. The rule could go into effect before year’s end. SEC officials were shocked at the unprecedented deluge of investor complaints that flooded the agency when it asked for comments of a series of vague proposals for rule changes. OTC News Network joined the movement, to report its progress and encourage reform, and hopefully, added to the deluge. To the surprise of investors who despaired that the SEC would ever act, the agency’s regulators came up with a rule that strikes at the heart of MMM. It was vindication of a sort for investors whose complaints were ridiculed by some brokers and traders and paid bashers. The SEC said that in 85% of the trades made, investors do not get the best price. If a trade exceeds the best price by even the smallest increment – 6.25 cents – an investor loses $62.50 on a 1,000-share trade. SEC said it suspects that some brokers may be “selling” their orders to MMs who pay them for the business, instead of routing them to centers where the best price can be obtained. SEC action follows the settlement of a class action lawsuit brought by investors against Charles Schwab, the largest online broker, for failing route buy and sell orders to market makers with the best price, and failing to disclose payments received for the placement of those orders. Investors agreed to drop the suit if Schwab would spend $20 million to educate investors and change the way it does business.