SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: richard surckla who wrote (48075)7/28/2000 2:01:56 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Richard,

If cost was not a factor and Rambus cost 5% LESS, would it then be the technology of choice?

DRDRAM is already the technology of choice for applications that require multiple high bandwidth ports.

On the other hand, CPUs require low latency, so DRDRAM will probably never be the memory of choice for computer motherboards.

The Stupid Guy



To: richard surckla who wrote (48075)7/28/2000 2:03:56 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Hi richard suckla; Re: "If cost was not a factor and Rambus cost 5% LESS, would it then be the technology of choice? If not, why? If yes, why?"

This is sort of hard to parse, particularly for a logic engineer. First you say cost is not a factor, then you say cost is 5% less. Then you say Rambus where you probably mean RDRAM. So I'll rewrite your question and answer it: If RIMMs cost 5% LESS, would they then be the technology of choice? If not, why? If yes, why?

Yes, if RIMMs were cheaper, (and the motherboard costs for RIMMs were similarly reduced), then RIMMs would be the technology of choice. Why? Simple. Most of engineering is about money. Save money in a product to make the company profitable. Choose the cheap memory. Get it?

Of course, RIMMs will never be anywhere near the price of DIMMs. So you might as well say "if your aunt had balls she'd be your uncle."

-- Carl