Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (26526)	7/29/2000 10:01:49 PM
From: Frank Griffin	Respond to of 769667

The good news, the blessing, is that people are becoming more aware and better understand when they are being misled. Gore and Clinton are far less effective now than they were with their scare tactics. Clinton is being unveiled with the tax cuts done one by one. He is unwilling to do away with the death tax even though there are arguments that the costs of administering the program are equal to the taxes they get. It is simply a jealousy and redistribution tax. However, most people now realize two things, it could happen to them and their family and (2) it just isn't fair or American to take half of someones estate that has already been taxed once. Clinton also is put in the awkward position of saying no to married couples. They pay more tax being married than they would pay if they were single and he isn't willing to sign a bill changing that. Now he is being put in a position of saying no to the tax imposed in 1993 when Gore was the deciding vote to tax the benefits of those on Social Security. So, he now is saying "no" to seniors and that "no" is to the seniors who are most in need. They are being exposed for what they are; big, high taxing, centralized government who could care less about the people. They want power. The people become economic pawns and many simply economic slaves to these people.

To: PROLIFE who wrote (26526)	7/30/2000 11:29:19 AM
From: lawdog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

PL, a woman has a right, free from your interference, to determine whether or not to carry a baby to term. I'm positive that you have run the gamut with regard to the issue. So have I. Neither of us will convince the other based on the conventional arguments that have been rehashed time and again. The fact is that your position is losing support within the GOP and that basically leaves your camp with no place to look for a power base. So, your screen name is going to be as outdated and unacceptable as PROSEGREGATION.