To: X Y Zebra who wrote (258 ) 7/30/2000 1:01:52 PM From: LPS5 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1426 Tazio, Absolutely. I'm not even speaking of the questionable nature of certain firms' business plans, particularly in light of what are, in many cases, very weak financial positions. The fact is, we're talking about small issues, with tight floats, extremely thin volume/attention, and for which trades cannot be electronically executed, making them subject to slower, manual executions. And that's yet another place where I find the "market maker conspiracy against OTCBB stocks!!!" whining hilarious. While dealers (market makers) do indeed make profits from changes in their inventory, they are at risk by providing capital to take the other side of certain trades. Yet the place in a large brokerage firm or wirehouse where the real position taking and active trading for profit takes place is the proprietary desk, sometimes called the "principle investment" desk or dept. Does anyone think that large firms proprietary desks care enough to mess with penny stocks? And if they did - which I'm sure they don't - that desk heads would let them put more than a token amount of money into a thinly-traded, tight floated, speculative issue? That risk management supervisors would let traders risk firm capital - theirs and many others' jobs, bonuses, plus individual anfd firm reputations - in certain historically speculative, incredibly risky issues that trade 20K, 50K, 100K shares per day, with spreads wider than their bids are tall? Particularly when there are the opportunities that there are on the exchanges, NASDAQ, convertibles, etc.? LOL. The volatility that people see in OTCBB and pink sheet stocks is, as I see it, probably a function of those dealers (market makers) NOT wanting to be exposed to long or short risky issues, and if anything, stepping out of the way...rather than them maliciously "pushing" the prices around. And as for professional, proprietary desks? Well, I'm quite sure that they don't partake :) LPS5