SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clappy who wrote (27138)7/30/2000 12:43:14 PM
From: Voltaire  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
Afternoon Clap,

I know this is not what you are wanting to hear but it is nothing more than a logical deduction and feel after scanning for hours and hours and then drawing the conclusion.

There are however certain dynamics that tend to draw me to all of the stocks you and I have mentioned. At the time of my sudden affinity to the above mentioned stocks they possessed certain qualities.

1. THEY MUST NOT BE IN DISFAVOR WITH THE STREET or HOUSES.

2. THEY MUST BASICALLY BE A QUASI-MONOPOLY

3. OUTSTANDING IF THEY HAVE A RELATIVELY LOW FLOAT

4. GREED OF THE HOUSES MUST BE STIMULATED BY PROJECTION OF UNREAL EARNINGS POTENTIAL

5. THEIR COMPETITION MUST ABSOLUTELY LOATH AND FEAR THEM

6. STUMBLING BLOCKS MUST BE VISIBLE TO ALL - THIS IS WHAT SENT THE Q UP AND WILL DO THE SAME FOR THE R

The NAZ and this downturn is nothing more than a self fulfilling TA move. The Houses will allow it to go down a bit further and then they come out and defend their inventory but remember the Houses make money both ways. They suck the longs in on the up moves and the shorts on the down moves and laugh the whole time as we move eventually this year to 5000.

V



To: Clappy who wrote (27138)7/30/2000 1:27:17 PM
From: Voltaire  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 35685
 
1) What indicates that RMBS is in the Houses' favor?

Sorry Clappy, did not mean to ignore that question.

Basically all Tier one stocks that have POTENTIAL to make the House's money will be in favor. The problem we will eventually have will be the same as the Q and Dell experienced and that is why I told people to get out of DEll.

The problem is ENVY and RESENTMENT on the part of the House's that are not part of a fantastic rise in a stock's price. For instance DELL and QCOM. Envy, resentment and ill will did not manifest itself to be deleterious to the stocks until what? A CRACK IN THEIR ARMOUR and then it is down hill until the stock proves itself again. This will also occur with RMBS but it will only be after that stupendous run we should see with each falling obstacle.

V