Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Conseco Insurance (CNO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (2115)	7/31/2000 10:46:30 AM
From: donjuan_demarco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4155

Kevin could you post the text? I'm not a subscriber and I would like to post the text on my Irwin Jacobs and the Temple of Doom board (a day by day progress report on Irwin's Big Adventure): Subject 36451

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (2115)	8/1/2000 3:07:06 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4155

Kevin:Interesting: " You covered ". Ofocurse the question is: When did you know and what did you know? Judge Sirrica @ Nixon trial. When did you cover and how much did you cover? cheers TA Message #2115 from Kevin Podsiadlik at Jul 31, 2000 10:41 AM Say, Tuna, remember how you were kvetching about all those those "negative" article on thestreet.com, and how Cramer responsible for all of them even though it wasn't his byline? (click the "1919" above if you've forgotten). Well here's your final debunking of that conspiracy theory. Cramer opines that Jacobs' short squeezing plan is likely to work(!) and recommends that the shorts "declare victory and move on", although he does add that he wouldn't suggest actually going long I obviously think he's Wrong!™ (though I did cover the shares I added on the recent spike), but that's all beside the point. thestreet.com