SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (121349)8/1/2000 12:13:09 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574679
 
If Intel can supply GHz CuMines in volume, will AMD suffer? Can AMD respond with higher frequency volume? I don't believe the claims that AMD can release higher speeds any time they want to because of their jacked up VCC. If a product has lots of headroom there's no reason to jackup the VCC yet AMD does so to ship GHz material. They're pushing the limits too.

EP,

I never say too much on this subject because its very difficult to prove anything. However, I have a sense that AMD is toying with Intel. Until Intel can really ship GHz in volume, I think AMD will do just enough to stay competitive.

From the very beginning, I have felt that AMD should always hold some cards back....and that's what I think they're strategy has been and continues to be.

ted



To: Elmer who wrote (121349)8/1/2000 12:16:12 AM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574679
 
Elmer - RE: "? I don't believe the claims that AMD can release higher speeds any time they want to because of their jacked up VCC. If a product has lots of headroom there's no reason to jackup the VCC yet AMD does so to ship GHz material. They're pushing the limits too."

Did you know the 1GHz PIII's voltage is jacked up compared to the slower speeds? And did you know the 1.13GHz PIII's voltage is jacked up even FURTHER than the 1GHz PIII's?