SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zainrehanzack who wrote (32363)8/1/2000 10:32:29 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
I see the point you are trying to make, the trend line at 934 is important but 200 days MA 927 is more sure a support..Trend line is one of the many tools you should rely on that is not the ultimate tool and as far as we don't see that 25 days i-timer below 13 we may see these sharp downward tests just a kind of quick movments to run the supports..

On this double top I would think that one needs to look at the chart real hard, if you see the first break-out with high of 1347 and close of 1332 on 3/10 we have seen six lower highs with a low of 872 on 4/14 and a new low of 853 on 5/23, now the double top you refer too or the article you have posted is a suspect one if you take the whole cycle, as far as 1273 on 6/21 and 1269 on 7/18 are concerned for me until the 927 is taken out this is very much within the wedge formation albeit we are right now testing the lower limits of the wedge, ofcourse if we break that 927 area we will be testing 880 area and even 815 from where we will bounce very strongly..

You may ask me why? for simple reason strong economy will produce strong numbers ultimately, the productivity gains are good, the companies this quarter came ahead of numbers and this sell out is based on rev short falls and future prospects but in the process we have seen some eal serious write off of capital base in stocks like TXN LSI and ATML, the market will build up this news very soon, the upcoming FOMC will be a cause of higher volatility but overall you will see that test of supports would be successful, inflation is feared and economy with unemployment is low but if the numbers does not show it you cannot creatre inflation, so fear based selling always leads to new oppportunities..

As far as your 6 ATML calls are concerned kiss them good bye for Aug, 37.5 is too far out if you can get 1 out of 3.5 you paid is good enough, the balance set it off against market education or paying dues as we call it..MCD Mar 35's can be a good bet.. regards



To: zainrehanzack who wrote (32363)8/2/2000 5:03:39 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Respond to of 50167
 
These are basic some issues I would like you to work around, needs more investigation like technical and others but would give you good platform to work on.. Know about this Moores Law and Metcalfe's law thoroughly.

<<These days, many well-known food stocks are trading at or near multiyear lows-and I'm scooping them into my personal portfolio. One of the best buys at the moment is Sara Lee (NYSE: SLE). The maker of Sara Lee cakes, Hillshire Farms cold cuts and Hanes hosiery is building a head of steam, with earnings for FY 2000 (ends June 30) expected to jump 10%-12% to a new record.

What's more, Sara Lee is energetically buying back its own stock. A few weeks ago, the company wrapped up a $3 billion buyback program announced in the fall of 1997. Now SLE is planning to repurchase another 70 million shares (currently valued at more than $1.2 billion). As the float shrinks, each surviving share owns a bigger piece of the business.

For icing on the cake, SLE throws off a 3% dividend. (The payout has been increased 23 years in a row.) Yet this superbly consistent growth company is selling today for the same price it fetched in early 1997-when Sara Lee's profits were 25% lower, and before the gigantic stock buyback got under way.

Madness? Maybe. Or just plain carelessness. Bargains like this can only occur when investors take their eye off the ball (and chase dot.com pipedreams). >>

<<SmithKline Beecham (NYSE: SBH) is a silver bullet in the human genome area. It's a U.K.-based company with American Depositary Receipts trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Each ADR represents five U.K. shares; just think of them as exactly like any other stock.

A little background: Stocks dealing with the human genome are very hot--it's probably the biggest thing going on in science this decade. Companies have been sequencing genes for years, working out the exact structure of the DNA of each gene. There are about 100,000 human genes, of which about 5,000 are medically relevant. A sequenced gene is like a detailed grid of a town--very handy, but it doesn't tell you how to get from one town to another. For that you need a comprehensive map. About the middle of next year, the human genome will be entirely mapped and we'll know where everything is in relation to everything else. The impact this will have on our health and health care system will be amazing.

Doctors will be able to use this information to screen patients for certain diseases, including top killers like cancer and heart disease. At birth, parents will be able to find out what diseases their children are likely to contract later in life, and modify their lifestyle and medical treatment appropriately. Consider the example of congenital glaucoma. If the first sign of this disease is dimming sight around age 11, which is typical, it is too late to operate and the child will go blind. However, if this gene can be detected at birth, the tear ducts can be opened while they're soft, and the child's vision can be saved. The human genome map will make miracle cures like this possible.

Which brings us to SmithKline Beecham--the little-recognized human genome play. The stock was around $71 early in November and closed the year in the low $60s! Wall Street thinks it's a typical big pharma, with not a lot of new drugs coming along and some others coming off patent. Jan Leschly, who's run the company since 1994, will resign in April, six months before his original date, when he turns 60. The line of succession is all set, but Wall Street wants to see the new CEO in action before buying. Last year SmithKline held merger talks with both American Home Products and Glaxo, but nothing came of them. Pretty boring.

SmithKline Owns the Rights to All Those Genes

Except there's one minor thing Wall Street forgot. When Human Genome Sciences was founded, their first deal was a monster: a $125 million funding from--SmithKline! As part of the deal, SBH got to cherry-pick the genes that HGSI developed and has numerous drug development programs under way. The gene-based drugs that SBH is working on target the chronic diseases of aging that have been so resistant to chemically-based drugs. It is these chronic diseases--cancer, heart disease, diabetes, macular degeneration, arthritis, asthma, osteoporosis and others--that are so brutally expensive to the health care system.

The five-year compound growth rate of revenues is only 7.5%, but that is biased low due to the sale of a large division in 1999. Looking forward, I expect SBH to hit my 15% minimum revenue growth target for a Great Growth Flow company. Paxil, an antidepressant, and Augmentin, a broad spectrum antibiotic, are the company's big producers. Avandia, a diabetes drug launched in he U.S. and Mexico, should get European approval in 2000 after a disappointing delay in 1999, and will further boost the bottom line.

Research and development spending as a percentage of sales runs around 10.5%, well over my 7% minimum. Pre-tax profit margins average 22.5%. That's typically high for a pharmaceutical company and far over the 15% we look for.

In the most recent quarter, SBH earned 44¢ an ADR, matching Wall Street's estimates. The company should do about 55¢ in the current quarter, bringing them in at $1.88 for the fiscal year on $13 billion in sales. In the 2000 year they should earn $2.25 a share, plus or minus 5¢, on $15 billion in sales. >>

<<Wealth Awaits Those Who Invest in the Still-New Tech Revolution
By Michael Murphy
Editor, Technology Investing
January 28, 2000

New technologies, such as the Internet, email, and wireless telecommunications, have dramatically changed the way we live, work, and play in recent years. But do you ever wonder what's in store three, five or even 20 years down the road? My search for dominant technology companies that we can profit from often leads me down this path. Today I'd like to tell you my thoughts on where technology will lead us in the years to come--and how you can use this information to rack up some tremendous investment returns. Fasten your seatbelt; we're in for a wild ride.

Today's $4,000 server has the neural processing power of a dragonfly. In 2002 that same level of computing power will cost less than $1,000. Today's $1,000 full-featured multimedia PC will cost under $250, and may be disguised as a cable TV set-top box or a luxury car stereo. In a car it will save some current costs by taking on many of the functions performed today by separate microcontrollers: braking, fuel/air mixing, air bag deployment, global positioning system and cellular telephone. In addition, of course, it will be connected to the Internet for maps, driving instructions, suggested restaurant and hotel stops, and any other data or computation you want. No mouse or keyboard required. You'll talk to it.

All of this will be driven by Moore's law that the number of transistors in a given area doubles every 18 months, which means the cost per transistor falls in half. It's the semiconductor equipment companies that have to implement Moore's law, and they all tell me they can keep up the pace for several years.

In electronics, Moore's law holds the key to how long the technology revolution continues. That PC that will have the neuronal intelligence of a dragonfly in 2002 will evolve to the level of a mouse by 2010. However, if the rate of increase in the cost of making chips continues at its current pace, it will become economically impossible to drive Moore's law any further. Because this is widely recognized in the industry, I am convinced these economic barriers will be overcome.

That will allow another huge evolutionary jump to 2018, when a mere $1,000 PC will have the neuronal intelligence of a human. Pretty scary. That's also the point at which we hit the physical limit of moving electrons around the surface of silicon--which means that we won't be able to cram any more lines on a chip because all the lines will be running into one another and there will be no more space.

But notice that I said "surface." The physical limitation is in two dimensions. If chip designers can move into 3D design and manufacturing--don't try this at home--Moore's law could be extended for many years. By 2028, the $1,000 PC would have the intelligence of a small village of, say, a thousand people. By 2048 it would have the intelligence of the entire planet--probably 10 billion people at that time. The issue then becomes whether the PC serves us or whether we were simply an evolutionary step in the development of silicon life forms that will rule the earth!

If 2010, 2018 and 2028 seem a long way away to you, let's talk about that other great driver of the technology economy: DNA. The human genome should be completely sequenced by the middle of next year. Currently, genes are sequenced one by one. It's like having a detailed map of Paris, Chicago and Half Moon Bay--very useful as far as it goes, but with no information on how to get from one place to the other. The Human Genome Project is mapping the whole genome by sequencing it from one end to the other. At the end of 2001 we'll have the map that tells us where everything is in relation to everything else. This is very important because most diseases are multigenic--more than one gene is involved. Even diseases where we have identified a causal gene, like breast cancer, don't hit everyone who has that gene and sometimes hit other people who don't have the gene. Why? The Genome Map should give us a clue.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see, this massive technology revolution we are living through is going to continue for many, many years to come. And smart investors who are tapped into the industry are going to make a killing in the months and years ahead. >>

<<Mid-Year Technology Review: The Revolution Rolls On (cont.)
By Michael Murphy
Editor, Technology Investing
July 28, 2000

So let's take a look at a few of the major growth drivers in the hottest technology industries, and I'll show you the best ways to profit from each one.

Communications Revolution

The main driver of the communications revolution is Metcalfe's Law. Metcalfe's Law says that the value of a network goes up by the square of the number of connections. That is, 10 people on a network are "worth" 100, but 20 people on a network are "worth" 400 — four times as much value with only twice as many people. The Internet, the email explosion, business exchanges, message boards — all seem to follow Metcalfe's Law.

The demand for communications services, hardware and components is red-hot. Not only is everyone trying to build up their Internet-related infrastructure, but the national and international telephone systems are being upgraded to handle data and video as well as voice.

Our horse in the components area has just made an important acquisition that will bring communications products to more than 50% of total revenues in the September quarter — and make it their fastest-growing business! Better still — the Street took it down last month with all the semiconductor stocks, and it's currently trading at a bargain-basement price. (Join my Technology Investing service on a risk-free trial basis today, and I'll tell you the name of this company — and my current buy price — as well as fill you in on my top picks in the communications services, hardware and shipment areas.)

The Internet

Internet traffic is still doubling every 100 days, which means it grows 10 times in one year and 1,000 times in three years. That's great evidence of the rapid, radical changes now under way — and the very reason you should increase your investments in technology stocks right now.

I've been careful in the Internet area to focus my readers' attention on profitable companies selling at reasonable valuations. We may someday own the Amazons and Aribas of the world — if they can show us sustained profitability and we can buy them at a reasonable price.

In the meantime, we can make plenty of money without falling into the risky "Internut" trap. My top recommendation — a leader in the very fast-growing online trading business — is not only a safe way to get some Internet sizzle into your portfolio, but it's the absolute cheapest stock I follow. You must buy it. (I'll tell you more about this exciting story when you join Technology Investing on a risk-free trial basis.) >> Don't join but reading all this helps your mind a lot..

I would like you all to go through this stock known as ETH, after Buffet purchase of Jordan this can be in play.. Cobot as you guys must have read has reversed its buy and thinks that itimer is flashing negative as it takes out the 50 days MA. IIX needs a careful look if it holds 471 support that would be good..



To: zainrehanzack who wrote (32363)8/3/2000 5:08:54 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
That post on SOX was good selection, now notice today the post of Brad Ruffins, I would like you to read the following carefully and see how beautifully the concept of retracement based on the great mathmatician Leonardo Fibonacci numbers who was an Italian mathematician born around the year 1170 is explained in a post from ''bull market trends''..very instructive reading..

<<FIBONACCI NUMBERS AND RETRACEMENT

Overview

It is believed Fibonacci discovered the relationship of what are now
referred to as Fibonacci numbers while studying the Great Pyramid of
Giza
in Egypt and by investigating how fast rabbits could breed in ideal
circumstances. Suppose a newborn pair of rabbits, one male, one
female,
is put in a field. Rabbits are able to mate at the age of one month so
at
the end of its second month a female can produce another pair of
rabbits.
Suppose our rabbits never die and the female always produces one new
pair
(one male, one female) every month from the second month on.

The puzzle Fibonacci posed was: How many pairs will there be in one
year?
At the end of the first month, they mate, but there is still one only 1
pair. At the end of the second month the female produces a new pair,
so
now there are 2 pairs of rabbits in the field. At the end of the third
month, the original female produces a second pair, making 3 pairs in
all
in the field. At the end of the fourth month, the original female has
produced yet another new pair, the female born two months ago produces
her
first pair also, making 5 pairs. The number of pairs of rabbits in the
field at the start of each month is 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, ...
The
next number in the Fibonacci sequence is arrived at by adding the
previous
two values together. Thus, to get the next value after 34 add 21 to 34
and arrive at 55. As you can see, Fibonacci numbers are a sequence of
numbers in which each successive number is the sum of the two previous
numbers:

1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, etc.

Now, if you take any two adjacent values and divide each one by their
sum,
a peculiar thing occurs, the values converge to 38.2% and 61.8%.

These numbers also possess an intriguing number of natural
interrelationships, such as the fact that any given number is
approximately 1.618 times the preceding number and any given number is
approximately 0.618 times the following number. The booklet
Understanding
Fibonacci Numbers by Edward Dobson contains a good discussion of these
interrelationships.

Chart Reading

All right, so much for the nice lesson in mathematics, but what's all
this
got to do with stock chart reading? Fibonacci numbers are used in
calculating retracement patterns. Many securities and market indices,
after making long sustained moves in one direction, will eventually
retrace a portion of the move before continuing on to extend it. The
most
popular retracement levels technicians and traders look for are the
38.2%,
50% and 61.8% levels. For example, if on its latest move, a stock went
from 50 to 100 and then started backing off, a 50% retracement would
bring
it to $75 before it turns around and continues its upward march. Most
commercially sold stock charting software packages will automatically
draw
in Fibonacci levels between short, medium, and long term pivot points
using traditional 23.6%, 33%, 38.2%, 50%, 61.8%, and 100% retracement
levels.

Retracements

Fibonacci Retracements are displayed by first drawing a trend line
between
two extreme points, for example, a high peak and the low point in a
trough
or a trough and an opposing peak. A series of nine horizontal lines
are
drawn intersecting the trend line at the Fibonacci levels of 0.0%,
23.6%,
38.2%, 50%, 61.8%, 100%, 161.8%, 261.8%, and 423.6%. After a
significant
price move (either up or down), prices will often retrace a significant
portion (if not all) of the original move. As prices retrace, support
and
resistance levels often occur at or near the Fibonacci Retracement
levels.

For an example of how to apply these retracement levels to a chart,
let’s
take a look at a recent chart of RF Micro Devices (RFMD). The chart
can
be found at the following web link:

bull-market.com

The chart is labeled with a high point of a peak occurring on June 6th,
2000 at a price of $141.50 and a low point occurring on July 27th at a
price of $64.50. The difference between the high and low points is
$77.
For this example, the 38.2%, 50%, and 61.8% Fibonacci retracement
levels
to the upside can be calculated using the formula:

Retracement Level % * (difference between points) + (value of low
point)
as follows.

38.2% Level = 38.2% * $77 + $64.50 = $94
50% Level = 50% * $77 + $64.50 = $102
61.8% Level = 61.8% * $77 + $64.50 = $112

These levels can be watched as price targets or resistance points where
selling may occur or, when calculating levels in the opposite
(downward)
direction, price targets or support points where short covering may
occur.>>



To: zainrehanzack who wrote (32363)8/3/2000 5:19:18 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
INTC 61.70-61.90 is a good support, a long trade on 65 calls with minimum six months time frame can be initiated if we see these levels expecting SOX to hold the test of 200 days and Comp rebound from the lower level of the gap, the stop loss would be 35% erosion of the premium the trigger of the trade would be around 3540 on Comp considering INTc is now at 62 plus and that one $ drop may take SOX as well as Comp lower.. just a trade you can look at..