Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : General Electric (GE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (1341)	8/1/2000 3:08:16 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3256

Here's the link, courtesy of a fellow SI member: news.ft.com

To: GVTucker who wrote (1341)	8/2/2000 1:35:01 PM
From: Dennis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3256

Very POSITIVE article in Wednesday's IBD (Aug.2).....can probably read it on line.....if not I can post the highlights if you wish. Go GGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE !!!!!!!! gg

To: GVTucker who wrote (1341)	8/2/2000 3:08:36 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Respond to of 3256

I love GE and think that Mr Welch is one in a million. My concerns are when HE the Great One is no longer "there". If negative momentum creeps into the stock then it may very well have the correction that most other stocks have had. I wait and live for great stocks to tumble .... I will wait with baited breath the next year or so....

To: GVTucker who wrote (1341)	8/2/2000 3:12:17 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Respond to of 3256

However in a week or so I shall start to look fer potholes as I sift through the financial info in detail. I have great faith in my Genius....I have trained myself to look for problems from rigorous mathematics ....theorem proof theorem proof...theorem....POOOOOF....hehehe

To: GVTucker who wrote (1341)	8/2/2000 4:43:49 PM
From: On the QT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3256

August 2,00 Hi GV, Thanks very much for posting a thought provoking article. While the author does balance his inquiry and supplies some positives, this article can lead one to a negative decision about GE’s prospects going forward. If one were to be unduly alarmed at the author’s subjective introduction of the possibility of GE becoming overextended in an unfriendly marketplace, if drawn from this assertion, I would disagree with that negative conclusion. Still, the author does give one cause to pause and reflect before going forward. GE has perhaps one of the better models for doing just that. Based on the published information that I am aware of,the prevailing opinion appears to be that GE is better shape than it was prior to the management change at GE Capital. The Marketplace is an other matter and one I suppose should assess their stock selection(s)and allocation(s)accordingly. Best Regards, QT PS. Today's IBD article is more in line with my current thoughts.