Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5436)	8/1/2000 5:23:36 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Respond to of 19428

Good! (also see: siliconinvestor.com About XLA. Tuesday August 1, 3:36 pm Eastern Time Morningstar.com Xcelera.com Is a Stock to Avoid By George E. Nichols Xcelera.com (AMEX: XLA - news) shareholders were breaking out the party favors Tuesday after the stock of the investor in European Internet firms was up more than 25% in late-afternoon trading, following its annual earnings announcement. But they have little to celebrate in the way of business fundamentals. Xcelera.com has skyrocketed more than 10,000% last year thanks mainly to Mirror Image, its top holding. Throughout the year, demand for the caching and content-distribution technologies developed by Mirror Image and other companies, such as Inktomi (Nasdaq: INKT - news) and Akamai (Nasdaq: AKAM - news), has driven up the valuations of these firms. Although Xcelera has fallen more than 80% from its high, it remains a speculative investment. The latest earnings report, released after Monday's market close, highlighted net income of $0.11 per share. However, this figure included gains from the sale of discontinued real-estate operations and without this one-time gain, the company actually lost $0.06. Total sales were $10.3 million, but this number should also be taken with a grain of salt. Practically all of it came from the discontinued real-estate business, while Internet operations accounted for only 0.4% of revenue. The Mirror Image business didn't generate significant revenue, and the latest release doesn't shed much light on Mirror Image's customer base. A February article in Internet World mentioned the company had ``a couple'' of paying customers; by comparison, Akamai had around 400 at the end of the first quarter. Also, the release noted two legal disputes, one of which could potentially dilute the amount of stock outstanding by approximately 32%. Perhaps the greatest concern is the lack of transparency. Xcelera.com, domiciled in the Cayman Islands, issues earnings releases only once a year. Moreover, Monday's announcement was for the year ended January 31. So even this latest release is outdated, leaving shareholders somewhat in the dark. It is tough to justify the lack of timely information, especially in the fast-changing world of the Internet. Lacking hard metrics, some shareholders will nevertheless continue to support Xcelera.com with blind devotion. It is a great story stock with devoted followers, some of whom don't take criticism of the stock lightly. A Smartmoney.com columnist who panned the stock was deluged with attacks from angry shareholders. And a Wall Street analyst who issued a ``sell'' recommendation for the stock was the target of thinly veiled death threats. This ``sell'' rating is noteworthy--such a recommendation is as rare as a snowman in the Cayman Islands. It is difficult to ascribe a fair value to a company that owns no public holdings, has radically changed its business model over the past year, and generates practically no revenue. And it may be years before Xcelera.com's recent investments in startups will prove to be winners or failures. Lacking such hard numbers, investors should analyze management's skill. Although Xcelera.com is sometimes compared to Internet Capital Group (Nasdaq: ICGE - news), such a comparison is misguided. Xcelera.com is managed by the Vik brothers, who lack the extensive technology experience of ICG management. Instead, their previous experience comes from managing an unsuccessful insurance firm. The brothers--Alexander, Gustav, and Erik--collectively own nearly three fourths of the company. While the company has instituted a share buyback plan, the brothers have been aggressively selling from their personal holdings. Investors may be wise to follow suit. Also see, or listen biz.yahoo.com

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5436)	8/1/2000 6:14:11 PM
From: Dana Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

Auric, What do you think about TEK? It is a solid company but has a high PE (~240) and ought to have similar problems to Agilent, its major competition. dana