SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (2545)8/2/2000 9:45:19 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
the winter Natural Gas contracts have declined too
precipitously it appears and were only selling for a
premium of 14.5% (dec 2000 NG) relative to June 2001.

I think this is part of the psychology of this bull market
in energy, many nonbelievers in the underlying demand, in
the energy complex.

SSB has been advocating buying Dec 2000 and selling june 2001 and waiting for the spread to expand in dec's favor.

Tuesday August 1, 2000
Summary
Early market OTC and weak cash markets could not contain the NYMEX natural
gas. Prices opened higher than early OTC trades and roared past cash numbers
in the low 3700 range. September natural gas moved higher throughout the
session to settle just shy of the 4000 level. September natural gas ended up
213 ticks at 3987. The 12-month strip was also up strongly to finish at
3871, up 132 ticks.
A combination of factors led to the price rise. The failure to follow OTC
and cash markets lower apparently caught some locals short. As commercial
buying reportedly entered the market,
locals were forced to cover their
shorts. Additional commercial buying drove prices to the 3900 level where
fund buying reportedly entered. Also in the mix was another industry storage
report that indicated a build of 55 bcf. Along with the low pressure area in
the Gulf of Mexico and a reported generation outage out West, prices advanced
substantially.
Tomorrow should focus on the AGA report, barring further organization of the
low pressure area in the Gulf. Our expectation for the AGA report is for a
build of between 63 and 73 bcf with a bias toward the lower end of that
range. Market expectations range from a build of 60 to 75 bcf.
This
compares to a build last year of only 26 bcf, a 3-year average of 50 bcf and
a 5-year average of 55 bcf. This could actually be the second week of the
injection season to exceed the 3 and 5-year averages. We consider any build
below 70 bcf to be bullish.
Nuclear generation again rose slightly to 91,708 MW, which is 1.6% ahead of
last year and 96% of total capacity.
CLOSING PRICES
NYMEX OPEN HIGH LOW SETTLE CHANGE
September 3775 4030 3775 3987 +213
October 3810 4030 3810 3986 +188
November 3925 4080 3925 4080 +174
December 4040 4180 4040 4180 +160
January 4040 4175 4040 4175 +156
February 3910 4040 3900 4005 +136
12-Month Strip 3871 +132
~



To: John Pitera who wrote (2545)8/2/2000 11:09:26 AM
From: Logain Ablar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Morning John:

On natural gas is it ready to break to a new high?

I still think we’ll have a very active Hurricane season which in the Gulf can further impact supply. The weather patterns so far indicate late Aug – mid Oct. as the most favorable for hurricane development in over 5 years (not sure of Africa for sending low pressure waves our way).

The East Coast pattern so far indicates the storms will move up the coast and not as many go out to sea.

On the Gulf we don’t have the wind patters coming across from the Pacific to hinder development, especially in the Gulf.

While I’ve been moving out of my tech holdings to cash I do like BR @ this level.

Tim



To: John Pitera who wrote (2545)8/2/2000 12:03:32 PM
From: Defrocked  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Some curve data for you.

Message 14150268



To: John Pitera who wrote (2545)8/3/2000 12:46:07 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Keeping with our CRB theme--Monthly Soybean Oil is
in a bottoming zone

geocities.com

this will take time to turn around.

------------

SOYBEAN OIL: Closing In On A Cycle
Low
James Nason, New York
In July 1999, soybean oil prices traded down to 14.66¢ and thus
reached the top end of what has been an important historical price
band. The dashed lines on the monthly chart (page, 2) show a pivotal
area between 12.95¢ and 15.00¢. In the 40 years of history shown,
cyclical highs prior to the 1973-74 super-bull market were mostly in
that zone. Subsequently, the 1975 and 1986 cyclical lows also fell in
that area. Therefore, purely from a price standpoint, the cyclical
decline from 1994's high has reached a potential bottoming range.
The monthly chart stochastic indicator is currently declining, but well
above its 1999 low. If prices move below 15.06¢, basis a monthly close, as we consider below, that momentum
indicator will almost surely display a bullish divergence. For trading purposes, such divergences lack the
significance of those on daily and weekly charts. Nonetheless, a bullish monthly divergence later this year or in
early 2001 would mimic behavior that occurred in bottom areas of 1967-68, 1991-92 and 1996-97.
The weekly chart (page 3, top) shows an annotated decline from the 1994 high. Four waves are shown in an
anticipated five-wave move. Ongoing April-July weakness represents the fifth wave. Depending upon
interpretation, the entire decline may or may not be a terminal wave in a larger sequence that began in 1988.
We do not consider that subject to be pertinent here, but there are price and time relationships that we want
to consider. The price distance covered in wave 1 was 957 points, while that in wave 3 was 1,480 points.
This is a ratio of 1.5. We do not expect a potential #5 wave to show equality with wave 1, but we think that
it could approximate a Fibonacci-related 61.8%. In that case, a fifth wave low would be 12.79¢. If wave 5
approximated 38.2% of wave 3, it would reach 13.05¢. Those levels bracket 12.95¢, the extreme low of the
long-term pivot range mentioned above.
In the context of time, wave 1 is large relative to all subsequent swings. It is about 2.66 times that of wave 3,
or, if the relationship is inverted, approximately a Fibonacci 38%. Waves 2 and 4 are approximately equal. If

2
we relate the time in wave 1 to the total time in waves 2, 3, 4 and a potentially developing wave 5, then the
sum of the time in waves 2 through 5 would equal wave 1 in October 2000. Interestingly, that coincides with
the market's seasonal tendency in the 1990s (shown in the Seasonal Analysis on page 7), where a preliminary
low occurs in July and is followed by a primary low in October.
Another point to consider is the position of the weekly stochastic indicator. Although it has yet to show a
flattening tendency, its values are below 12 and at a level that usually results in, at least, an interim price low/
rally attempt. Open interest at 135,000 contracts is below the all-time high of April 1998 (168,749), but, in
absolute terms, is high. Despite the substantial price washout since 1998, the open commitment has not
liquidated. Since a significant speculative net position does not exist, we interpret the large total open interest
number to mean that commercial interests have established a huge hedge position. Further, we think that, if
the position begins to unwind, it will have a positive, or higher, impact on prices.
In summary, when considering the absolute level of soybean oil prices, the position of intermediate- and long-term
momentum indicators, various price and time relationships and the makeup of the open commitment, we
conclude that a major price low is pending. A worst-case scenario would have it occur in a fourth-quarter
washout that features the nearby futures trading into the 13.05-12.79¢ area. A best case alternative would
be what wave analysts term a "failure," where the illustrated weekly chart wave 5 terminates above 14.66¢.
Reality could be somewhere in between. We are buy oriented toward soybean oil long term, but think the
market should be given latitude on the downside. We would like to see the December soybean oil prices
below 15¢, more than 1¢ below current levels, before attempting the long side. However, if the nearby
futures were to trade below 14.66¢ and the December futures were to settle at 17.06¢ (dashed line on the
daily chart at bottom of page 3), then we would consider that a signal to attempt long positions.

------------

I love the type of momentum divergences that we have been getting for the past several weeks as we have grinded lower in the bean oil. this can be seen on the 1 yr daily
dec soybean oil chart (boz0)

geocities.com

you can see how we are breaking the blue downtrend line, and are in a descending
wedge (in red) those are the types of formations where we have lower lows in
price and higher lows in the MACD and RSI.

the dec bean oil could have a rally all the way to the 1750 area based on a
retracement of the descending wedge, especially considering how we
are in the zone on the monthly chart were longer term bottoms are put in.

one additional item, the seasonal tendencies support a rally
phase into late aug but we could see one more wash out low
into late sept or early oct.

geocities.com

John