SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ColtonGang who wrote (27202)8/2/2000 9:41:57 AM
From: Bill  Respond to of 769667
 
I'm better off. But I'd be MUCH better off if Clinton wasn't constantly trying to steal my money. Thank goodness for the repub congress!



To: ColtonGang who wrote (27202)8/2/2000 9:42:52 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Don't I get credit for any personal effort? I pay a hellova a lot more taxes now than I did in '92. Can I factor that into my decision?

If my choice was Gore or abject humiliating poverty, then and only then would I pick Gore. Thank God our choices are broader than that.

if answered no, you'd be better off with food stamps.



To: ColtonGang who wrote (27202)8/2/2000 9:47:31 AM
From: Frank Griffin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
David, I think we are far worse off. Maybe not financially but in every other way. The moral fiber of the country is weakened. The lesson is honor, truth and patriotism has been severely damaged. The respect for the leadership of the oval office is very smudged. The people are not protected but used. The people are not told the truth and our President has used his powers for reasons that are not honorable. Bombings to divert attention, hirings and appointments that shouldn't happen, dealing and giving our secrets to others for some unknown or known gain, making citizens of about a million people with no check just so they could vote for Clinton and Gore in 1996, and on and on. Yes, we are much worse off. We have to regain the dignity of the office and have a President who will make decisions for the good of the country and the people and not for selfish political gain.



To: ColtonGang who wrote (27202)8/2/2000 12:31:30 PM
From: haqihana  Respond to of 769667
 
Clinton didn't have a damn thing to do with the gains in the economy. If you think he did, you know nothing about economics, or the influence of a President on them. It's the Congress, stupid!! ~H~