Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s-words who wrote (1997)	8/2/2000 11:28:02 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2484

In that case, allow me: sec.gov sec.gov These are the lists of Internet cases being prosecuted by the SEC. Check them out and I think you will not find very many where the defendants are "bashers". Or, put the SEC on ignore if you think it will help.

To: s-words who wrote (1997)	8/2/2000 11:28:13 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2484

s-words, I notice you don't object to dds1 throwing out 'vague non-factual innuendo' when he refers to some fantasy 'criminal conspiracy'. As far as SEC prosecutions are concerned, I was referring to those for criminal conspiracies to manipulate stock prices. This is not "vague non-factual innuendo'. This is a very specific reference. The SEC publishes their list at sec.gov Why not do a little research and discover who is really ripping off the public? Or does it make you feel better to maintain the fantasy that the shorts are out to get you? As far as dds1 having me on ignore, it sure doesn't bother me that he isn't interested in facts. Anyone who wants to play ostrich is welcome to do so as far as I'm concerned. Regards, Barb