Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (20793)	8/2/2000 4:18:47 PM
From: Evan F	Respond to of 27311

>I believe that there is a big difference between a device that maintains a charge for 1 month and one that has the >potential of discharging during a single day of normal use. Yeah, the single day device needs a big Valence battery! ;-)

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (20793)	8/3/2000 11:02:55 AM
From: Robert Cohen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

If a licensing deal were signed today, what would be the shortest time that someone could come on line with product? If VLNC provides technology, laminate and personnel, I would think that at least 6-12 months would be required. In a typical deal are monies received up front with additional royalties when product comes to market? While there is no doubt that licensing can and would ultimately bring in addtional cash, it is less clear that in the near term, it would solve the issue of second source. Robert