Scumbag, isn't this "Esq" a pal of your from IBUY days?: "Mr. Sayre's criminal attorney,
Thomas Fehn, says his client is out of the country and he negotiating with authorities regarding Mr. Sayre's return."
Hopefully you can afford someone better than Mr. Fehn to help you with your indictment.
"SEC Acts at Cyberspeed to Halt Suspect Trades JOHN R. EMSHWILLER
On March 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Los Angeles
office received a telephone tip that the skyrocketing stock price of a little
Internet company called eConnect Inc. was being fueled by false press
releases.
The Internet company's shares had rocketed to $16.50 a share the day
before from under $1.50 on Feb. 28, giving eConnect -- which had a loss
of $23.3 million in 1999 on revenue of just $40,000 -- a market value of
more than $2 billion.
Under the standard procedure followed for most of its seven decades, the
SEC would have assigned the case to a lawyer, who would have
investigated ... and investigated, often for years. But that was then; this is
cyber-now, and the SEC is scrambling to get on Internet time.
Within hours of the tip, three SEC attorneys were working on the case.
They quickly decided that two of eConnect's press releases were
inaccurate, and began preparing what became a 17-page memo for the
agency's Washington office, which they e-mailed late that evening. By the
next afternoon they had gotten approval to halt trading in the stock the
following week.
The rapid attack on eConnect, which says it provides technology for
financial transactions over the Internet, shows a push by the SEC to move
against at least some suspected violators -- mostly involving small
companies -- before their alleged wrongdoings have been long forgotten.
This new urgency was prompted by the Internet, whose enormous impact
on stock trading caught the SEC, like much of Wall Street, off guard.
In 1998, Chairman Arthur Levitt called for an overhaul of the enforcement
division, in part to respond to the burgeoning fraud involving the Internet.
At the time, the SEC's Internet-fraud unit only had two full-time staffers
and most of the agency's enforcement staff didn't have Internet access at
their desks.
With new funding, the SEC's Office of Internet Enforcement now has a
staff of 15 and has opened small branches within the agency's regional
offices. Another 240 staff attorneys have been trained in fighting online
fraud. Since early last year, more than three dozen fraud cases, mostly
Internet related, have been filed within a week to eight months --
sprint-like times compared with past standards.
The SEC also has found new ways to combat burgeoning Internet stock
fraud. The past year, rather than open time-consuming investigations, the
SEC sent warning letters to 95 Web site operators who appeared to be
illegally selling stock. Of those, 65% withdrew the offerings or closed their
Web sites. Most of the others are talking with the SEC. Three are under
investigation.
SEC officials acknowledge there may be many more opportunities for
fraud than the agency can handle. "We can't be everywhere," says Richard
Walker, a 49-year-old former Wall Street lawyer who became the SEC's
enforcement chief 28 months ago. "Speed helps reinforce a strong
deterrent message," he says
However, defense lawyers argue that the SEC is sometimes spinning the
wheels of justice too fast to get the necessary facts. In the eConnect case,
the agency "reacted too quickly" and "the wrong people got sued," says
Irving Einhorn, a lawyer for the company and a former head of the SEC's
Los Angeles office.
EConnect had already had one run-in with the SEC. The agency had filed
a complaint against the company in March 1999, when it was operating
under a different name, for failing to file certain required financial
statements, but eConnect had acknowledged its failure and promised to do
better.
Then earlier this year, the stock of eConnect caught on fire. On Feb. 28,
the company announced a "strategic alliance" with a Florida brokerage
firm, Empire Financial Group Inc. The next day, a group called
Independent Financial Reports distributed the first of four "buy"
recommendations for eConnect, saying the stock could easily reach $12 to
$25 a share. By the end of that day, the stock price had nearly doubled, to
$2.50 a share.
On March 1, IFR put out a second release on eConnect, noting its
"explosive" market performance. Two days later, eConnect issued a press
release about a "unique" licensing arrangement involving the Palm Pilot
handheld computer. And the same day, a third IFR press release extolled
the Palm Pilot deal and eConnect's "universally in-demand technology."
On March 8, IFR issued its fourth press release on eConnect, predicting
that this "new powerhouse in the emerging technology sector" could
"easily" hit $100 to $135 a share within the next year. The stock climbed
as high as $20 a share during the day before retreating to $16.50. The next
day, a short seller -- who makes money when a stock's price falls -- called
the SEC to complain about the company's press releases.
Lisa Gok, head of Internet enforcement in the Los Angeles office and a
10-year SEC veteran, noted eConnect's huge jumps in price and trading
volume via Yahoo! She also saw the bullish press releases, some of which
had been posted on Raging Bull, a popular Internet stock-discussion site.
Then she told three more lawyers in the office's new seven-person Internet
branch to drop what they were doing and start checking the accuracy of
eConnect's public statements. By the end of the day, SEC officials said,
they had gotten information from an official at Palm Inc. that the licensing
deal praised in one of the releases didn't exist. Likewise, Empire, the
Florida brokerage firm, said the announcement of its "strategic alliance"
with eConnect overstated the relationship.
Ms. Gok and her colleagues decided to move to halt in the trading of
eConnect stock. The SEC has authority to suspend a stock's trading for up
to 10 business days. Last year, the regulator halted trading in 20 stocks,
mostly Bulletin Board issues, up from one in 1994. With barely a minute to
spare before the Los Angeles office's computer system automatically shut
down for the night at 11 p.m., the lawyers sent their trading-halt
recommendation by e-mail to Washington headquarters.
On March 23, two weeks after receiving the tip and shortly before trading
was set to resume, the SEC filed suit in Los Angeles federal court accusing
the company, and Thomas Hughes, its president, of issuing false press
releases. Mr. Hughes and eConnect quickly settled, agreeing to an
injunction against future wrongdoing without admitting or denying the
allegations. Mr. Hughes says he settled with the SEC to avoid the cost of
litigation. He and other eConnect representatives insist that the documents
were essentially accurate and that the SEC never gave the company a
chance to tell their story. "I would have liked to have had the SEC take the
time to call," says Mr. Hughes. SEC officials say they didn't feel that talking
to the company was necessary. "We were moving on an emergency basis,"
says Valerie Caproni, chief of the SEC Los Angeles office.
EConnect's stock, which trades on the over-the-counter Bulletin Board
with other issues too small for a Nasdaq Stock Market listing, plunged
after the trading halt was lifted and is currently about 55 cents a share.
Meanwhile, more than 20 shareholder lawsuits have been filed against the
company. An eConnect spokesman denies the company engaged in any
wrongdoing and Mr. Hughes says that no eConnect officials sold any
shares in the company during the stock's runup.
But the case had another twist. After the SEC announced the trading halt,
it got a call from Stephen Sayre, the sole officer of Independent Financial
Reports, the stock-research firm that had heavily recommended
eConnect's shares. He offered the SEC his help and officials invited him to
come by for a talk -- under oath.
On March 31, Mr. Sayre arrived alone, dressed in breakaway warm-up
pants and a tight-fitting T-shirt. The 44-year-old Mr. Sayre said he had a
correspondence-school degree in psychology and that he had spent time
doing top-secret work for the U.S. military, according to a transcript of his
SEC deposition. He said he was a would-be film producer but made his
living operating a Los Angeles area tree-trimming business.
With IFR, he hoped to build a career as an independent stock picker. Mr.
Sayre swore that he hadn't ever traded eConnect stock or been paid by
the company -- although he had talked to Mr. Hughes while researching
the company. (Mr. Hughes acknowledges talking with Mr. Sayre, but says
that was the extent of their relationship.)
The SEC found that Mr. Sayre had also incorporated an entity called
Silver Screen Industries. Agency investigators say they found that he had
opened two brokerage accounts in Silver Screen's name that were used to
buy and sell more than 177,000 eConnect shares, for a profit the SEC
calculates at $1.4 million. In early April the SEC filed a civil fraud suit in
Los Angeles federal court against Mr. Sayre and federal prosecutors filed
criminal charges soon afterward. When the SEC attorneys subpoenaed
Mr. Sayre's U.S. bank records, they found that funds had been transferred
beginning in mid-March -- just after the eConnect trading halt started -- to
a Canadian bank account. With the aid of Canadian authorities, the
account was found to contain more than $19 million. SEC officials decline
to speculate where all that money might have come from. Mr. Sayre's
criminal attorney, Thomas Fehn, says his client is out of the country and he
negotiating with authorities regarding Mr. Sayre's return. He said his client
denies all the charges against him. " |
