SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Voltaire who wrote (27621)8/2/2000 10:57:57 PM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35685
 
I am not questioning your love, your kind words, or anything else so emotional. I asked if we could keep our exchanges on the topic of the market only. I understood that this might not be possible. No problem.

I answered your PM with kindness as you will recall. (BTW, I do not think we should be discussing our PM's in public, but that is not that important now.)

You surmise that I was looking for an excuse. This is incorrect. As well, I don't feel like I have been "run off".

Anyway, I can see that we have fallen further down this slippery slope.

Good luck. --Allan



To: Voltaire who wrote (27621)8/2/2000 11:01:11 PM
From: abuelita  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35685
 
Tom.
Yes we did. But, just because he also posts on that "other dreaded thread" should not mean that he has to qualify his intent in order to post here. And I believe, rightly or wrongly, that's what Clappy post conveyed. FWIW and IMHO and everything else that I should put in here in order to cover my ass.
Rose



To: Voltaire who wrote (27621)8/2/2000 11:02:03 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
Volt! I might have 'run 'em off...

Hope so ... doubted the veracity of the young man from the first post here.

Look: you folks can always count on me ... maybe I could become <LOL> what is that: it's like the 'bouncer' in 'Parliamentary Procedure' in organizations ...

Not the 'treasurer;' not the 'secretary;' OH YES!

It's the 'sargeant-at-arms!'

LOL!!

Call on me any time for such services. <g>

"b-i-a"
###