Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (121700)	8/3/2000 2:09:13 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575421

RE:"On balance, Paul, Elmer, Yousef, and other Intellabees have been correct about AMD stock performance far more often than most of the longs on the thread." Now, I'm really rolling on the floor laughing... Sure...Yousef...old "shorty" himself... Paul...well at least his actions were OK...he didn't sell at 36 on the way up Elmer...smart cookie... Jim

To: Scumbria who wrote (121700)	8/3/2000 5:14:30 PM
From: Gopher Broke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575421

On balance, Paul, Elmer, Yousef, and other Intellabees have been correct about AMD stock performance far more often than most of the longs on the thread. I disagree. By their actions they have called AMD's meteoric rise correctly and profited from it, but their posts have been very misleading. Paul is stocking up on AMD and at the same time posting that they are going down the tubes. Elmer is knocking AMD and at the same time writing naked puts (which I think he may be regretting a little at present). Both of them want and expect AMD to do well. They just get a kick out of stirring things up. I think the "correctness" of their predictions has to be judged by the nature of their posts and, in that regard, I would say that Elmer generally implies AMD should continue flat (to allow him to milk his puts and covered calls) and Paul implies AMD should dive to zero (beats me why - so he can lose out on his substantial AMD investment?). Both have proven to be very incorrect predictions over the last year. And the most incorrect of all is that they are both still bullish on Intel. IMO Intel have seen their final all-time high.