SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The O who wrote (20532)8/3/2000 5:08:39 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 28311
 
.



To: The O who wrote (20532)8/3/2000 5:08:41 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 28311
 
.



To: The O who wrote (20532)8/3/2000 5:10:22 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 28311
 
Is there any way to stop this deal given the support of Russ and PA?

Only if the other 60% of the companies shareholders vote no on their proxies, which is quite unlikely since most don't bother to return their proxies at all.

Besides, refusing the deal would cost GNET $120 million in break up fees, grievously depleting the company's cash position.

The only way that I'm aware of getting out of this deal would be for GNET to discover some impropriety on the part of INSP, either in their having misrepresented their fundamentals and/or business operations, or with regard to accounting "errors" that drastically alter the worth of INSP shares.

I haven't read the 8K merger agreement all the way through, but I suspect that whether or not such a contingency were stated as a justifiable cause for GNET pulling out without a penalty, a civil court would probably rule in our favor.

Of course, that's all dependent upon someone closely scrutinizing INSP's books and discovering something amiss that wasn't disclosed to GNET before the merger was agreed to.

I wonder if Jain still doesn't care about his stock price (as mentioned in recent articles)?

I know I do.

But most of all, I'm curious to know if he is descended from a family of "skyclads", as suggested by his name.

Regards,

Ron

PS: sorry about the triple post... editing glitch.



To: The O who wrote (20532)8/3/2000 5:45:37 PM
From: trouthead  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 28311
 
Given that we know so little about how the merger will really affect future revenue it seems a bit early to talk about trying to quash the deal. Are your fears based on facts?

Listen to HOMEE. He knows da truth.

jb