SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (84746)8/3/2000 4:52:19 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 108807
 
Well, I really haven't followed this, but I suppose it is an interesting digression.....



To: jbe who wrote (84746)8/3/2000 5:13:00 PM
From: cosmicforce  Respond to of 108807
 
Thank [insert deity here] for the Supreme Court overturning some really obnoxious court cases where "anonomous informants" (maybe an officer at a payphone) could finger people and the police then could act with abandon, ignoring Constitutional rights, because they could set themselves into "hot pursuit" mode.

I always ask people if a) are individual rights or b) government (or group) rights, more under attack these days? I'd have to select individual rights, myself.



To: jbe who wrote (84746)8/3/2000 6:23:43 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Respond to of 108807
 
Governor powers limited.

The fate of Graham had
rested with the 18-member
Texas Board of Pardons
and Paroles. It which could
have recommended that
Gov. George W. Bush issue
a 120-day reprieve, a
commutation or a pardon.
Without the
recommendation, the
Republican presidential
candidate can do nothing
under state law.



To: jbe who wrote (84746)8/3/2000 7:05:59 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
jbe, You people keep forgetting that Graham did receive a stay of execution from Ann Richards. By constitutional law, GWB was forbidden to grant him a second stay. Don't blame an individual for and entire constitution. The constitution also, does not offer a choice of punishment like life imprisonment without possibility of parole, so don't blame one man for that either. Almost all of those who have been executed in the last 8 years, were not convicted, or sentenced on Bush's watch. You're barking up the wrong tree, but rabid dogs do that sort of thing. (I don't mean that viciously. Just smarting off.) ~H~



To: jbe who wrote (84746)8/3/2000 8:12:58 PM
From: CharleyMike  Respond to of 108807
 
OK, jbe, One more time.

The Governor of Texas, whether Democrat or Republican, has no authority to stay the execution of any convicted person without the prior recommendation of the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

In the case you suggest, the BoP&P refused any clemency whatsoever.

And, IMO, rightfully so.



To: jbe who wrote (84746)8/3/2000 8:25:29 PM
From: James R. Barrett  Respond to of 108807
 
Even if he's not guilty of murder he still deserves to die for his other crimes that he confessed to.