Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Kulicke and Soffa -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Red Dragon who wrote (4052)	8/4/2000 5:23:41 PM
From: scott_jiminez	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5482

Sounds pretty straightforward to me. I get it Dragon. In spite of what virtually everyone says, i.e. pay more attention to the insiders buys than sells, you believe in the exact reverse. BUT FORGET ABOUT THAT. You find insight in a theory that has 50% validity. The stock goes up 200% with no insider buying during the prior months and then goes from ~$30 to $16 following insider selling. Thus there was no insider indicator for the huge run-up. So your indicator works 50% of the time. Like flipping coin. Did I miss something? Sounds pretty straightforward to me. Thanks for the support. (and prior to accusing someone else of being confused (!), why not trying looking at the actual revenue numbers over the last 12 quarters. Then come back here and present your proof. Just think of that ongoing warm and fuzzy feeling you'll maintain for be right so often)