SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48978)8/4/2000 8:58:43 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Ten,

That's why RDRAM (and DDR SDRAM) isn't necessary for large-scale servers yet. Such servers create memory bandwidth the old-fashioned way: they brute-force it.

With DDR, you can get the same bandwidth, using half as many pins as PC66.

Scumbria



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48978)8/4/2000 9:51:31 PM
From: gnuman  Respond to of 93625
 
Tench, thanks for the info. It makes a lot of sense. But I have to say, this whole memory issue is confusing as hell to me.
Seem's though, that plain vanilla SDRAM will have major market share a lot longer than many people think. (Even in desk tops).
But JMHO.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48978)8/5/2000 11:07:11 AM
From: blake_paterson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Ten, re: <<Gelsinger is a little off...probably said Itanium needed PC100 because product qualification is probably being done only w/ PC100 modules.>>

I think that it was likely Robertson's mistake. Note he did not QUOTE Gelsinger on this point. He was likely putting words in the interviewees mouth, as usual:

""Gelsinger confirmed that the Itanium will not offer support for Direct Rambus memory, but instead will run only with single-data-rate SDRAM-and 100-MHz PC100 SDRAM at that.""

Reminds me of the old adage: "..its always easier to tell the truth because then you don't have to remember all of your lies.."

Just my speculation,

BP