SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EJhonsa who wrote (7890)8/5/2000 1:25:06 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12823
 
Hi Eric,

While I enjoy discussing this area (cable TV) of the LM, I don't profess to be exceptionally knowledgeable in it. There are some posters on these boards who know far more than I about this topic, and that's why I usually ask for corrections and comments.

Let me address the issue that you raised. Granted, I, too, believe that both functions (and more) could and eventually will be integrated in a single enclosure called the stb.

But a chip does not an industry architecture make. Almost every salient point in the release that you cited was written in the future tense. Also, there is the issue of the millions of boxes that have been contracted for, and that must still be manufactured and delivered to customers, prior to a prospective "manufacturer" (implying: other than Broadcom) comes out with the integrated STB to, in fact, incorporate the dual chip capabilities in a new STB design.

Then there is the matter of the DOCSIS standards. Is the proposed box that the dual chip supports a certified component of the DOCSIS framework, i.e., in the manner in which it will be implemented?

Again, I don't know the answer to this, and I welcome in this case an answer to this question, along with comments and corrections.

Re: Cabliphony, or VoIP over Cable: I've lost count of the number of vedors who've come out with software, DSPs and other chips to support VoIP over cable. It will come to pass, no doubt. But when? I don't know.

Simply having a chip in place to support VoIP (among other things) is not enough. There are bellhead genre Operations Support System issues and backoffice agendas concerning how the MSOs interface to the established PSTN that must be solved first ...before an MSO plugs into a voip environment to play voice in the big leagues. BTW, thanks for bringing that release to the thread's attention.

FTTH the person, Denve, et al ... assuming someone builds a box around it, how does this chip play with DOCSIS acceptance? No brainer? Or does it require going to a vote?

FAC



To: EJhonsa who wrote (7890)8/5/2000 5:05:13 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12823
 
Eric, All,

Clearly I stand fully corrected, and I thank you and those who have helped me to see the new order of things re: the future multi-functionality of the STB.

My last statement in my post 7887 recalled from an earlier (perhaps even a current?) DOCSIS standard which showed the modem communications features of the STB that were solely concerned with decoding digital video and audio, and not for the purposes of supporting your typical cable modem purposes (which were implied <at least I thought was implied> to be separate in scope, i.e., handled by another unit, the CM).

I was advised by ftth (the person) earlier today that among the emerging standards which are in the process of being finalized, both for video entertainment and voice as well as standard data, these integrated features will indeed be sanctioned by Cable Labs DOCSIS standards, if in fact they are not, already.

Having said all of that, one cannot help reflect for a moment on just how much is being crammed into the HFC at this time -- as both the ramp up of new subscribers continues, and new system features are being added -- and where it can eventually go, given the limitations imposed by the inherent design of the spectrum split on HFC, with particular focus on the upstream channel(s).

Yes, I know that this is a separate discussion, but it should be kept in mind when assessing the overall picture when the same pipe is constantly being called upon to do more things. IMO, its clear that more needs to be done to both [ i ] open up the upstream, somehow (not a trivial matter, since the cable spectrum split is quite unforgiving in this regard), and [ ii ] to ensure a greater degree of dedicatedness of spectrum {channel use) for each end user, without beating them up topside the head by imposing a price-tiered QoS model. The most obvious technique to achieve this, again, is one that mimics T's smaller clusters that they were piloting (anyone have an update on Lightwire?) through the extension of fiber closer to end users a la Fiber to the Neighborhood/Curb, or FTTN/C.

Lately, I've been softening somewhat from a full FTTH (the platform) stance, because I've seen some nifty improvements over HFC that hold promise, both in the drop cable and in the trunk back to the head end(s). Back on point, however, does anyone see an issue with stuffing too much integration into the STB? Does every user get a fully-loaded complete-feature integrated device? Or, does the operator tend to this matter piecemeal, and decides who gets which "modular capabilities" based on the offerings that individual subscribers elect?

ftth, earlier you rattled off the two standards that speak to the issues at the top of this post, but I didn't catch what they were. Would you expand?

FAC



To: EJhonsa who wrote (7890)9/26/2000 6:57:24 AM
From: Mkilloran  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Eric.Are investors ready to tune in on interactive TV?
news.cnet.com

By Dawn Kawamoto
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
September 25, 2000, 1:25 p.m. PT
After several years of hype that ran well ahead of reality, interactive television is starting to attract viewers and investors.

The convergence of television and Internet usage is on the verge of creating a major new sector, but finding the right investment can be as daunting as locating a "Seinfeld" rerun on a cable system with 500 channels.


• Get the "Big Picture"
• Related News
• Message Boards




Quote Snapshot

AOL 56.44 +1.19

MSFT 61.25 -2.00

T 28.88 -0.88

MOT 31.75 -0.62

LBRT 32.25 -0.19

TIVO 19.27 +0.95

WINK 13.12 -0.88


Enter symbol:

· Symbol Lookup
Quotes delayed 20+ minutes



The share prices of many companies operating in the sector are well below their 52-week highs but have shown signs of life recently. In addition, what has largely been a behind-the-scenes battle has become very public in recent weeks, thanks to concerns over the AOL-Time Warner merger and a high-profile setback for Microsoft.

The interactive television sector is expected to reach revenues of $48.2 billion by 2005 from an estimated $848 million this year, according to Forrester Research. The reason: 99 percent of U.S. households have TV sets and about 40 percent are connected to the Net, according to investment bank ING Barings. A more recent push has come from advances in set-top boxes, operating systems, upgraded cable networks and more compelling content.

To help understand this nascent market, analysts divide the industry into these segments: infrastructure companies, which include the digital set-top box makers, operating system companies and so-called middleware companies. In addition, there are several applications companies and a smattering of content providers. Finally, there are companies that are looking to offer services, such as America Online, Microsoft and Excite@Home.

Picking the winners
"Infrastructure providers that enable interactive services probably offer more revenue visibility in the near term. That's because equipment and software are required to enable interactive services," said Spencer Wang, an ING Barings analyst who recently published a report, "The Interactive Television Guide, Version 1.0.

He added that investors currently aren't sure which applications will prove popular with consumers, but in the future, these companies, along with content companies, will provide the best returns. These two groups have the greatest potential for capturing recurring revenues from subscriptions, advertising and e-commerce, Wang noted.


5 messages
How do I find wang's report?
Interactive TV = oxymoron.com Dennis Jugan

Watch the patent holders!!!! edvirtual

AOL TV????? EDVIRTUAL

way cool randy herrick

More commentary


Industry and financial analysts caution, however, that although interactive television has made inroads, it still has a ways to go before it's clearly defined. Companies are undergoing rapid change, realigning their product offerings, and focusing on the part of the industry they want to own.

Nonetheless, for investors with a long-term outlook who don't mind some risk, here are some of the major, publicly owned companies worth considering:

Makers of set-top boxes
Motorola, which acquired General Instruments this year, and Scientific Atlanta are the largest companies in this field. Smaller players include Sony, Pioneer and Philips Electronics.

These digital boxes sit on top of customers' television sets and are connected either to cable or a satellite dish. The set-top boxes convert digital TV signals into a language that can be understood by analog televisions.

Currently, interactive TV is a small piece of Motorola's billion-dollar business. The former General Instruments accounted for 8.2 percent, or $768 million, of Motorola's $9.3 billion second-quarter revenues. But when it comes to the digital set-top arena, Motorola's broadband communications business is in the lead. The company shipped 1.4 million boxes in the second quarter and is on track to ship 5.5 million units for the year.



Interactive TV (3/18/00)
Scientific Atlanta, meanwhile, was a step behind Motorola. The company shipped 835,000 boxes during its fiscal fourth quarter that ended June 30. Analysts expect the company to ship roughly 4.3 million boxes during its current fiscal year. In the fourth quarter, Scientific Atlanta increased its production capacity to 1 million set-top boxes from 500,000.

Gary Lieberman, an analyst with Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, said in a research note that while he expects the company to ship approximately 1 million boxes in the fiscal first quarter, he wouldn't be surprised if the company surpasses his second-quarter estimate of 1.05 million as production increases.

Scientific Atlanta, meanwhile, generated nearly $553 million during the fourth quarter, a 56 percent increase over the year-ago period. It posted a net profit of $59 million, a 25 percent increase over last year. The company's shares, however, have since fallen by nearly a third since reaching a 52-week high of $94 a share in mid-August.

Operating sytems
While the operating system is a crucial component of the industry, from an investment standpoint there are no pure-plays.

Companies that offer operating systems to run these devices include software giant Microsoft, which has Windows CE, Sun Microsystems' Java OS, Scientific Atlanta's PowerTV, and Wind River Systems' VxWorks.

Prakesh Patel, an analyst with WR Hambrecht, estimated that interactive TV-related sales accounted for roughly 10 percent to 15 percent of Wind River's $101.3 million in second-quarter revenue.

"If you really believe in interactive TV, then you should invest in the pure-plays," Wang said.

That narrows the field to less than a dozen companies, including applications companies such as ACTV and Source Media, interactive program guide company Gemstar-TV Guide International, personal recording device company TiVo, video-on-demand companies Concurrent Computer and SeaChange, and Wink Communications, which allows customers to get additional information on programming and advertising via their remote controls.

Liberty Digital is considered a pure-play content company, while Liberate Technologies and OpenTV are some of the few pure-play infrastructure companies.

Middleware companies
Microsoft, Liberate and OpenTV are competitors in what is called the middleware market. Middleware operates between the operating system and an application, allowing developers to ignore the hardware and components when creating applications.

Last week, for example, Liberate announced it's poised to take some of Microsoft's AT&T business away. AT&T is gearing up to unveil set-top boxes for interactive television and is said to be frustrated by delays in Microsoft's technology.

"Liberate has the ability to scale with the demand of the Internet, especially at a time when Microsoft is not executing," Chase H&Q analyst Jack Ripsteen said.

The AT&T deal, along with a similar deal with UPC, have helped drive Liberate's stock up about 91 percent since mid-August. The stock closed at $32.44 on Friday, up $3.31, or about 11 percent. The shares, however, are still well below their 52-week high of $148.50.

The company also announced its fiscal first-quarter results last week, posting a 78 percent increase in revenues to $9.4 million from a year ago. Its pro forma net loss slipped to $9 million from $10.1 million a year ago.

Liberate, which counts Oracle as a major investor, also installed its software on more than 150,000 set-top boxes in the quarter, bringing its total to more than 300,000 worldwide. The company also has deals with 18 network operators.

OpenTV, meanwhile, announced last week that set-top maker Motorola was increasing its stake to 5.4 percent with a $83.4 million investment.

The company currently has a larger footprint than Liberate, with 1.5 million set-top boxes installed in the second quarter, bringing its total to 9.3 million. The company also struck alliances with 32 network operators.

During the second quarter, OpenTV reported revenues of $11.3 million, up 83 percent from a year ago. OpenTV's pro forma net loss, however, widened to $3.3 million in the quarter from $1.2 million a year earlier.

Meanwhile, shares of OpenTV have fallen more than 80 percent from their 52-week high, closing at $41.31 on Friday, up $1.63, or about 4 percent.

Applications companies
Among applications companies, analysts list Gemstar as a major player.

"We view Gemstar as one of the best-positioned companies in the interactive TV (iTV) sector, owing to its leadership position in the interactive program guide (IPG) business. In our opinion, the IPG is the first iTV killer application that is a must in an expanding multichannel universe," Wang's report noted. He added that along with the TV Guide brand, he envisions Gemstar's program guide to dominate as a TV portal.

The IPG allows people to find television shows by title, time slot or category via remote control. They also have the ability to use the remote control to find additional information about the shows.

Gemstar generates revenues from advertising, as well as license fees from manufacturers using eBooks, its portable, electronic reading device. The company reported a 40 percent jump in fiscal first-quarter revenues to $63.2 million for the period ending June 30, compared with last year. Meanwhile, net profits doubled to $28.9 million.

In July, the company acquired TV Guide for $14.9 billion--making it the largest U.S. TV program guide distributor.

The company's stock has more than doubled since late May, but at a current price of about $76 it's still well below its 52-week high of $107.43.

Interactive TV services
America Online launched AOLTV last June, setting the stage for a fierce battle with Microsoft's WebTV service. Both companies offer users email and Web browsing.

But AOL is expected to get the added advantage of tapping content from its planned merger partner and media giant, Time Warner. Also, Time Warner will give AOL the broadband access its been seeking, via its cable properties. Rivals are lobbying the Federal Communications Commission to place restrictions on the deal, such as ensuring competitors receive access to the cable network. Meanwhile, music companies are asking the European Commission to block the deal.








More from News.com


• TiVo wants your sweet nothings September 15, 2000
• Microsoft offers free WebTV service to MSN subscribers September 15, 2000
• Microsoft, CBS team on interactive TV programming September 7, 2000
• Can Liberate cash in on Microsoft's set-top stumble? August 30, 2000
• OpenTV shares zoom on reports of AT&T's interest August 29, 2000
• AOL, Time Warner defend interactive TV services August 25, 2000
• Liberty Digital, Sony plan interactive TV network August 21, 2000
• Gemstar closes TV Guide acquisition July 13, 2000

• Send us your news tips • Get the "Big Picture" • Get News Alerts
• Message Boards • Search News.com



news.cnet.com