Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Joe who wrote (57023)	8/5/2000 4:49:48 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 117012

Little joe, If you read this thread last Thursday you may have encountered a post of mine that started with the following, "I'm gonna do a Bob Johnson and stay neutral..." As for your <<Did I miss something?>> it becomes very subjective now as I could say that if you did read my post, then no, but as we all know from everyday experience lots of information we give others does indeed enter through sight sound and touch towards that place we call a head where most all of us do have that thing called gray matter for brains, or $hits for brains, or bone head i think means a bone for a brain, and on and on. So if you did read my post and if it did reach you head, then it depends what happened next, as for example in Ron Reeses case my post either do a U turn and a quick exit, or my posts are stopped at a toll gate like area and asked if this flow of information is totally and absolutely to agree with a Ron's prior post, and if not..."Return to Sender." ok, i will assume you read my post and also that you do not have a Ron Reese Teflon type brain surface and my comments were not absorbed to represent stuff ok for consumption, but only clogged the surface of you brain to be steel wool scoured with a heavy duty cleaner. I'm in a quagmire here, if you already read that post of mine, which I gave a reason for the following, <<Is there some reason to believe that Russia and/or China intends to bring their reserves equal to the U.S.?>> then all I'm gonna do is re-clog up your brain surface, and you will most likely this time send me the cleaning bill as it will require professional equipment not found at home. Lets change your question so that it reflects a change in what I said, that way I can modify your question so that it more fits in with that post I wrote Thursday, thereby creating another question that you would have asked me rather than the one you did leading to a new position you would have arrived at, being that you agreed with what I said and would of had no reason to ask a question, so you did not. ok? all done? Good, now rather than I do as I stated to be done, let me make this process shorter and much simplier by changing your question instead. Same end result using a different mode of transporatation, your question. <<Is there some reason to believe that Russia and/or China could advanced their military might after, and because of, a major increase in the amount of physical gold they hold in their Central Banks?>> Attached to the above could be an additional question to ask if they could do like that 2 birds with 1 stone in that the actually obtaining physical gold could have an effect to weaken the USA economy and military. (follows that post i did) ... Follows are sound bites. Duh! Platinum and palladium gold in very short supply demand increases overproduction availability of leased gold gold as a commodity My comments are directed towards <<gold as a commodity>>. Whereas all are commodities, platinum and palladium to my understanding have demand in use for things that are required under law like car pollution devices, and used in things that if not present would result in poor or limited usage, like maybe engines that need high temperature contact surfaces(i forget if this is the titanium metal, but you get my point i hope). But gold as a commodities ranks near zero comparied to platinum and palladium in regards to the importance of the products use in for commerce and military. Add to this the above supply of gold in bullion, coins, jewerly and scrap is very large as in a zillion years if it use was required for only electrical mission critical areas in military and space program, while the supply of platinum and palladium is weeks or months. Kind of hard for me to see gold being a concern of the average earth citizen, especially when they are clueless on its role in keeping paper or credit money honest. Even letting those who hold gold as a store of wealth keep their coins or bars or mostly simply shaped solid jewerly pieces, there a huge amount above ground left to supply for 1/2 a zillion years. As long as gold is not viewed as more than jewerly or as a store of value not promoted as important by the major world nations, then supply in the form of paper gold will always exist enough to depress its price. As for producers cutting back production to reduce the amount of physical gold available, then if the physical demand is mostly jewerly and the nations leaders like in the USA determine that it would be a threat to the health of the usa paper dollar, then you bet the producers would be made an offer they were not be able to refuse to conclude with them not holding back production. May already have happened. Forget producers, as to me the only way a low physical gold supply will occur and rocket its price upwards to the moon is if as commented on the Le Metropole Cafe that Russia and/or China decides to bust America's USA economic strength by buying gold big time for permanent storage in their Central Banks. Why do this if a collapse of the USA economy will also take theirs along for the ride. Simple answer. (pause.... need a hint?) (hint, what do Russia and China fear the most?) not the USA economic might but what the USA economic might allows the USA to do do with what ? its the money obtained by the USA government through taxes better economy, more pay checks, more tax money tax money for military and today, big problem = ??? today USA military low on weapons and equipment and personnal = paychecks needed so today USA military is number 1 not because its a great machine but because Russia's fell down and China's is not yet built up high tech most important and needed by USA government is ? money to take it back to being a super power military not there today only seems that way because Russia's collapsed so answere is Russia and China tank USA economy so that USA cannot rebuild its military if USA military continues at same level and continues to weaken then years form today especially if Russia and China has the physical gold the USA will be only one of three super military powers gold rules by letting Russia's and China's military might increase and USA's military weaken so a day arrive, all 3 equal if so, then it would be i have bad news and bad news and bad....... doug