Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Kulicke and Soffa -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Red Dragon who wrote (4074)	8/5/2000 3:22:34 PM
From: scott_jiminez	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5482

We are no longer surprised at your behavior RD. You found a post that 'happened' to agree with everything you've been saying all along. Well surprise, surprise. And consistent with your behavior in the past, subsequent posts that responded in the negative were ignored: You cited post 14780 posted at 10:37 AM. About 30 minutes after you posted your message, two Yahoo messages were placed. This one, addressed to the author of the post you cited, starts off, 'For the record, I think you're full of baloney.' messages.yahoo.com And then there was this one, again addressed to that original poster, which I'll post here in its entirety (my emphasis) messages.yahoo.com "You say <<As Scott succeeded in destroying a lot of credibility there is little reason to believe his statements about business picking up speed again, starting in q201.>> I kindly request when you make such a statement you clearly indicate these are your impressions. My impressions were the exact opposite - by being so forthright, rapid, and honest about bonder deliveries, he has elevated my confidence in his earnings projections. You also seem to have forgotten that SK stated that the company may still make the original earnings projections. People like you are being given full voice right now while others who think the stock will come back fast are being ignored or being called names. I don't share any of your opinions of SK. I don't feel your 'worst case scenario' is even remotely based in fact but rather is a knee jerk emotional reaction to the moment. I guess this is your 15 minutes in the spotlight. --------------- I guess it just must of slipped your mind, RD, to return to the Yahoo thread to see if everyone agreed with your 'excellent post'. Or, more likely, these posts that disagree with your viewpoint are part of the 'noise' you referred to. I get it.