SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chic_hearne who wrote (9187)8/8/2000 12:10:06 AM
From: Ken98  Respond to of 436258
 
<<A first-of-its-kind study of the more than 170 IPOs brought to market since 1996 by Wall Street's eight largest and best-known equity underwriters reveals the astonishing fact that as of this writing, the stocks of the dot-com sector have turned out to be a bonanza for institutional investors — and a colossal sucker's bet for retail investors in the public aftermarket. ...

As the boom continued, this in turn enabled underwriters to bring increasingly shoddy merchandise to market, even as retail investors wound up paying higher and higher prices for the increasingly shaky offerings. In the end, the retail investors became the dot-com bubble's Greater Fools, standing there with outstretched arms to buy what the smart money was all too eager to sell.>>

msnbc.com

Like, duh....



To: chic_hearne who wrote (9187)8/8/2000 12:14:18 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Chic, I'm out of IBM now, I did short it and also got stopped on that pop on Thursday (with a small loss).

One problem with shorting IBM is, for better or worse, its better defended in a downdraft than a smaller co with less institutional interest (e.g, KLIC). I still think they're a POS, but I agree with you, there are better short candidates. Will be looking for a reentry on DELL after "earnings".....