SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric K. who wrote (107216)8/9/2000 3:24:33 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Eric The K - Re: "However, the rational explanation for Intel charging twice as much for the 1.13 GHz versus the 1 GHz "

What the H*LL are you yakking about?

Intel DOESN'T CHARGE twice as much for the 1.13 GHz as the 1 GHz Pentium III !!!

Why do you keep acting like a COMPLETE IMBECILE ?

Intel priced the 1.13 GHz at $990 - the ECACT SAME PRICE as the 1.0 GHz Pentium III when it was introduced.

What DELL charges for the their PCs is DELL's BUSINESS - NOT INTEL's !!

Paul



To: Eric K. who wrote (107216)8/9/2000 12:14:02 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Eric, <However, the rational explanation for Intel charging twice as much for the 1.13 GHz versus the 1 GHz part is an attempt to make sure that the exceedingly low volumes of this part are exceedingly irrelevant because so few customers actually want to pay for it.>

Well duh. It's called supply and demand.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News