Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (7371)	8/10/2000 10:21:01 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

I'm not calling anyone here a fraud Eddy. I'm calling companies like CCSI a fraud because that is - in fact - what they are. Even the most superficial DD would have uncovered what a ridiculous operation this was. You see Eddy, unlike you I actually bother to do in-depth research insted of simply reading the news releases of the company's paid promoters. <<<CCSI is not and was not a shirt loser for me.It was a hands on study which unfortunately cost me $ 12.000>>> I think your $12 would have been better spent on three happy-meals. <<<Indeed. How come that this person did the disappearing act just when it started it`s dive?>>> As far as your paranoid delusion that I somehow timed my exit from SI to coincide with the collapse of IFMX, you may want to review past posts where I specifically mentioned I sold my position at 14 7/8. You may also want to take a look at what a great number of tech stocks have done since April. <<<And believe it or not, since Eddy Blinker is most likely the only one on SI who actually can see "The Shorts" on his display,>>> Uh huh...you "see the shorts on your display" - and you are the only one who can "see the shorts". Tell me Eddy, do the little voices in your head tell you that the shorts are out to get you? Behave yourself on my thread Eddy, or I'm going to have to bitch-slap you some more.