Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (49422)	8/11/2000 10:02:16 AM
From: Ian Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Fraud or not, it looks like the market believes it! There is some real panic selling going on. Got out at 67 Edit - back in at 63 1/2

To: jim kelley who wrote (49422)	8/11/2000 10:15:38 AM
From: gnuman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Jim, re EN Aug 11, 2000 --- Intel Corp. has pulled the plug on plans to use Rambus direct memory in the mainstream PC market, according to confidential documents obtained by Electronic News. Intel's Desktop 2001 Roadmap Update indicates direct Rambus DRAM (RDRAM) will only be used in the high-end desk-top market. (Emphasis mine). What do you suppose that is? electronicnews.com

To: jim kelley who wrote (49422)	8/11/2000 10:17:24 AM
From: Estephen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

chaners electronic news has a history of fraud. It's amazing how they get away with. Last year this time it was "ibm abandons rambus on multiple fronts!!" which was promptly denied by ibm. But they still accomplished what they wanted

To: jim kelley who wrote (49422)	8/11/2000 2:31:49 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Jim, <Bert McComas is also making up Intel's roadmap. What they are doing smells like fraud.> I'm sorry to say this, Jim, but it seems Bert is pretty close to the truth here. I do not know what Intel's roadmap is for desktops, since I'm a server guy, but I can find no obvious attempt at FUD-mongering in Bert McComas' statements. (At least none that compares to Carl's obvious attempts ...) But remember that Intel's roadmaps seem to change with the wind. So you never know ... Tenchusatsu