Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bryston who wrote (15615)	8/11/2000 5:48:52 PM
From: BobRealEstate	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29987

Maurice and bryston, I never said Valueman was dumb or uninformed. I have heard his whining about IFN for a long while now and am just sick of it. Despite G's marketing blunders, their engineering has been dead on and one of the reasons that CDMA was chosen was to assist in maximizing the capacity out of the current constellation for perhaps just such an app. I have no problem with valid criticisms, I just like lightening up the mix of critique to keep things interesting. Bashing typically takes the form of that type of incessant singularly focused critique. The latest one to come and go was I coming back from the dead to undercut G's per minute rate and put G in the grave. Please... The latest craze to go on is that the bank loan revenue covenant due to be met by 3/31/01 won't be achieved spelling certain BK for G. I worked on the Street and I have seen not one of those ancillary covenants used against a troubled co. ever. They were either waived or just ignored. Please... With official G inclusion in Wingcast and fixed phone sales in Australia and Mexico now rumored, the momentum is now positively set. I really don't want to see more utter junk commentary about how IFN will bankrupt G* by robbing its capacity. The pencil necks at Rockwell are pretty sharp and Sir Rupert is no piker. They wouldn't have signed on if IFN were a technological bust.