Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SONS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s-words who wrote (43)	8/12/2000 7:32:23 PM
From: Fundamentls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575

I have heard of clauses like this before, but have not run into them before, and I do not think they are common. Not necessarily bad, although it should put a brake on the price. It's a lot better than IPOs from some of the scumbag underwriters where the the S-1 covers insider shares and says there a lockup but that the lockup can be waived by the underwriter. Those are often good short candidates after the inevitable pump, while the yahooligans swear up and down that insiders aren't selling. The IPO price was $23. Looks like they left a little on the table, huh? Regards, Fund