SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (36694)8/12/2000 11:34:51 PM
From: Ian@SI  Respond to of 70976
 
I guess that's why IFX is able to to get a few more good chips / 300mm wafer than the chips / wafer coming out of a 200 mm fab.

While feature sizes may shrink, chip sizes haven't (at least not to the same degree). Rather transistor count per chip, functionality and value have gone up much more rapidly than ASPs.

More value delivered continues to fuel demand growth.

It's time to buy!



To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (36694)8/13/2000 6:52:45 AM
From: w0z  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
"Couple this with 300mm and the confidence we have that AMATs 300mm tools will at least be as productive as the 200mm (wafer throughput), and overcapacity is a given."

The question is not if but when. If you believe this chart, I doubt 300mm is going to flood the market anytime soon:

geocities.com

(Graph by Gottfried from this data: siliconinvestor.com