SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (4815)8/13/2000 1:51:51 PM
From: TechieGuy-altRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
<font color=green>Scumbria, Ali, Paul or anyone else...

>>>>Re: "BTW, did Intel make any such "bus speed doubling, new chipsets, extra cache" enhancements to the Pentium X-1 when the Pentium X came out? (Applicable all the way back to even the 486 to Pentium transition, what the heck, even before that, 386 to 486)?"

>>You don't know the answer to this and you have the gall to call yourself a TechieGuy ??

>>You are clueless enough to think that Intel HAS NOT CHANGED the bus speed, chip sets and cache on nearly EVERY PROCESSOR generation going back to the 8086 ?

>>TechieGuy - get lost - you waste everybody's time.

>>Buy a game machine and go sit in a corner.

Tch, Tch Paul, resorting to name calling? are we?

I think that you misunderstood my question. I thought that a PhD would understand the "x vs x-1" without any problem, but I guess not. Let me restate:

In previous generation transitions (you know like from the 486 to the Pentium, from the Pentium to the Pentium II, from the Pentium II to the Pentium III), did Intel, during any of these transitions, after having released the NEXT generation processor to the market, go back and did these bus speed doubling, cache increasing, new chipset etc. enhancements to the previous generation processors ?

Paul, if you don't want to answer the question just say so! Please don't resort to juvenile name calling.

Maybe Scumbria or Ali or anyone else with better memory and knowledge than me could answer this question?

TIA guys (and perhaps gals),

TG



To: Paul Engel who wrote (4815)8/13/2000 4:16:49 PM
From: BilowRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Hi all; Re Paul Engel's post: "you have the gall to call yourself a TechieGuy ??" ... "You are clueless" ... "get lost - you waste everybody's time." ... "go sit in a corner." #reply-14205976

I think it is time to get rid of Paul permanently. You can count this as a vote in favor of same.

-- Carl



To: Paul Engel who wrote (4815)8/14/2000 12:47:34 PM
From: Mani1Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Paul, re <<You are clueless...get lost...you waste everybody's time...go sit in a corner>>

Sigh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I really do not want to deal with another vote :(

Your point is very valid, the delivery is where the problem is!

Mani