SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (107453)8/13/2000 11:32:31 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer, >The Xeon's added silicon cost is in the additional cache. If FudgeDumper is to be effective in an SMP environment it will need a big cache too. Assuming AMD can ever get SMP working that is.....

Why are we comparing Xeon with FudgeDumper? Xeon is current. Isn't the latter a year or so away? Isn't Foster still on the roadmap for next Q1 or Q2? So, why not FudgeDumper vs. Foster (or Itanium)?

Tony



To: Elmer who wrote (107453)8/13/2000 12:49:11 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Elmer - Re: ". Assuming AMD can ever get SMP working that is....."

AMD has SMP Athlons working already - IN THE LAB !!!.

They have been IN THE LAB !!! for over a year now.

Paul