Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Computerized Thermal Imaging CIO (formerly COII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ripalip who wrote (5378)	8/14/2000 9:52:31 AM
From: who cares?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6039

Let's say the word gets out that THERE'S this OTHER technology that is let's say, 96% accurate in detecting breast cancer, maybe even MORE accurate ? We WILL see. Gee, when the CEO was asked about the system being less accurate than mammography, he didn't dispute it in the least. He didn't say that was out and out wrong, and he didn't say that they might get more accurate in the future. He only said that CTI was less painful that mammography, that's all it had going for it. It's PLEASANT What the hell are you talking about? Is this why the women will be lining up? This is just completely bizarre. Face it dufus, as long as it's less accurate, doctors are not going to use it instead of mammography, and risk the obvious litigation that will come from every patient that had cancer that was not detected. This is patently obvious, but i'm sure you can rip through a couple of good rant posts to try to hem and haw your way around this. CMB