SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EricRR who wrote (4983)8/14/2000 3:04:24 PM
From: 5dave22Respond to of 275872
 
RR <Once Duron volumes get going, I don't know how Intel's Celeron can possibly compete.>

What's going on with Timna?



To: EricRR who wrote (4983)8/14/2000 3:20:24 PM
From: kash johalRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Ratbertryand,

re: Intels 0.13 and tualatin.

Well Intel is big enough where they are covering their butts on 0.13 migration.

It seems to me Intels product line will transition to:

Timna -- very low end - should do 800-900Mhz max at 0.18 micron.

Tualatin -- probably in 0.9-1.4Ghz range.

Willy -- at 1.4-2Ghz.

Product transitions are never easy.

Depending upon how AMD performs -- Tualatin could end up being low to mid end.

A gap (for AMD to drive a truck thru per bert mccomas)

And willy at high end (maybe as fast as 2Ghz).

Bert Mccomas and scumbria and others have speculated that willy will have lower IPC than AThlon by 20% or so.

Just some thoughts:

Tbird at 0.13 micron should scale to a 60-70mm2 die size and should be very competitive with Tualatin and costs should get reduced to sub $40.

As long as it scales to 1.5Ghz or so (and see no reason why it won't) it should put AMD in a great position.

Now clearly tbird will be replaced by mustang but its comforting to know that even if mustang core is a bust tbird is a competitive platform till end of 2001.

regards,

Kash



To: EricRR who wrote (4983)8/14/2000 3:32:17 PM
From: rsi_boyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Don't forget the Celeron's biggest advantage comes from integration and low system cost. You can buy a mcro atx Board with integrated everything for less than the price of a duron motherboard with nothing. Sure uma video performance stinks but the average consumer is hardly aware of that. I don't think the Celeron is much danger until AMD can get their platform costs down or until we see an integrated chipset for the duron.



To: EricRR who wrote (4983)8/14/2000 4:04:32 PM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Ratbert, <Once Duron volumes get going, I don't know how Intel's Celeron can possibly compete. They will be forced to go to 100MHz FSB, or else risk Celeron generating "K6" style ASP's, with Duron taking the higher spots.>

Didn't you just answer your own question regarding Celeron's ability to compete performance-wise?

Tenchusatsu