Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Who Really Pays Taxes? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.horn who wrote (107)	8/14/2000 4:48:33 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 666

It is not a waste of a vote to cast the ballot for the man who I think is best suited for the job. It is a waste of a vote to compromise and vote for one of the interchangeable candidates for big gov't. I will be voting a straight Libertarian ticket as I have since 1980, because it's the type of gov't I want to see. BTW, if my only choices were republicrat or demopublican I'd vote for Gore. That is, if I mysteriously found myself in a voting booth on election day, which I wouldn't if those were the only two choices. Regards, Barb

To: c.horn who wrote (107)	8/14/2000 4:50:39 PM
From: freeus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 666

I read it. However, having studied this country's government and run for office myself I will not waste my vote. A vote for Harry Browne and other Libertarians is the only one that does not waste a vote, because it sends the message the I truly want a smaller government with radically less spending and radically less control over my life. Freeus It is also (to me) the only vote of conscious: how can I seriously consider voting for anyone who I know will further more regulation, more spending, more taxing? All the others will do that.