SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Broadcom (BRCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Roger Hess who wrote (4142)8/15/2000 9:36:43 AM
From: hospitalman  Respond to of 6531
 
I'm sure most of the employees would follow Nick and Samueli but even if they didn't 50% ownership is plenty to stop any takeover effort.
I am not techie enough to understand all of the ramifications of brcm's acqusitions. I am simply betting on the management team here--they have an outstanding track record, they have more money at stake than I do (one of my grandest understatements!) and as long as they grow like they have been I will stick with them.
Ken



To: Roger Hess who wrote (4142)8/15/2000 4:05:20 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6531
 
Hi Roger,

I can't educate you as well as the CPA's around here might regarding the practices of the profession. I do know that the FASB and GAAP are no way near recognizing the tremendous thrust of obsolescence caused by the rapid advance of technology. And thus are taking retrograde steps like eliminating the pooling-of-interests accounting that has been a standard feature of technology company merger accountancy for many years. By trying to solve one problem, they will inadvertently enter the realm of the "law of unintended consequences", IMO. Look for a plethora of deals in the fall, as the deadline to end pooling-of-interests accounting is the end of the year.

If there are any accountants or tax professionals here who can explain to me why eliminating pooling-of-interest accounting is a good thing, I'd love to hear the justifications. So far, everything I've gotten from industry mouthpieces simply does not ring true.

Comments and corrections welcomed.

JM2C, Ray



To: Roger Hess who wrote (4142)8/15/2000 9:44:58 PM
From: Keith A Walker  Respond to of 6531
 
If I recall, about a year ago, the company issued 1,000,000 shares of Class B stock for about $1,000/sh. (Someone please check me on this.) It also carries greater voting authority than the Class A common. It went to Nicholas in exchange for his Class A shares. He controls the company. End of story.