Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EricRR who wrote (5128)	8/16/2000 10:51:16 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Ratbert, Interesting read. I especially enjoyed reading it a second time, this time substituting the word "IA64" for "RMBS," and "software developers" for "memory makers." Good one. But I think the memory makers have more at stake than the software developers. BTW, could you elaborate on your earlier post on Intel thread: Message 14213161 where you say: Do you understand why the thunking mechanism that microsoft will use to execute 32 bit binaries on NT 64 will cause catastrophic performance penalties on a VLIW CPU? Would you design a VLIW CPU if you thought dynamic bindings was the future of software? Do you understand why HP is "giving" there VLIW CPU designs to Intel, why HP thinks they hold a technological wildcard that such CPU's will absolutely require? Joe