SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KailuaBoy who wrote (24666)8/15/2000 2:55:36 PM
From: Rob C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
(New throughout, adds analyst conference call)
By Jana Sanchez and Lucas van Grinsven
LONDON/AMSTERDAM, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Cable TV operator UPC
said on Tuesday its new digital TV set top boxes could run on
software from rivals to its shareholder Microsoft Corp., as the
U.S. company was late supplying its interactive TV software.
Microsoft, which owns an 8 percent stake in UPC, will miss
its September deadline and its software may not even be ready
by the first quarter, UPC Chairman Mark Schneider told an
analysts conference.
United Pan-Europe Communications NV, Europe's largest cable
operator with close to 7 million subscribers, would pursue the
launch of its digital set-top boxes, albeit with bare-bones
functionality from non-specified vendors.
If Microsoft did not have its full interactive software
ready by the first quarter, UPC would use software from others,
Schneider said.
"Microsoft is late .... There's working software out there,
the OpenTV <OPTV.O><OPTV.AS>, Liberate <LBRT.O> platform and
ExciteAtHome <ATHM.O> platform," Scheider said. "We'll work
with them."
By the end of the year UPC would decide which software to
use, he added.
Sources familiar with the situation had told Reuters
earlier this month that Microsoft was unlikely to meet the
September deadline for its interactive digital TV services.
Microsoft said last week it had drawn up a "Plan B" to
provide UPC with basic software that would help it go ahead
with the introduction this year of the first 30,000 digital set
top boxes. But these boxes would only have one or two of
interactive functions, instead of over a dozen.
UPC did not specify whether the simple software for the
first 30,000 boxes would be from Microsoft or others.
When the improved software was ready, UPC said it would
download it straight into the set-top box at home without a
technician present.
"It's a computer. You can do that with a computer,"
Schneider said.
UPC WILL NOT WAIT UNTIL MICROSOFT IS READY
Its stake in UPC would not give Microsoft the clout to hold
back UPC's introduction of interactive TV, UPC's chief
executive said.
"If you (Microsoft) can't show up at the right time to
deliver, frankly, you don't have any rights," Schneider said.
Microsoft has numerous investments in cable companies
worldwide, which competitors in the past have dubbed part of a
strategy to buy itself a presence in the TV software business.
In addition to UPC, Microsoft has taken stakes in Britain's
Telewest <TWT.L>, NTL <NTLI.O> and Portugal's TV Cabo
<PTMN.IN>.
All of these companies have said they will use Microsoft
software in their digital TV boxes.
But UPC said it was not doing any favours. The Microsoft TV
software, if working, would be the Rolls Royce of the pack.
"We like Microsoft software best," Scheider said.
NO FINANCIAL HIT EXPECTED
UPC said it would not be financially hurt by the delayed
introduction of full-fledged set-top boxes. Scheider said his
company had not factored in large interactive TV revenues for
this year anyway.
But he did expect UPC to offer a wide range of interactive
services by the beginning of next year, such as
video-on-demand, telephony, electronic programming and Internet
access.
On top of the 30,000 boxes UPC would sell this year, the
company expected to distribute another 300,000 set-top boxes in
2001, Scheider told analysts.
Europe's largest cable operator in terms of number of
customers, UPC is 51 percent owned by UnitedGlobalCom
<UCOMA.O>.



To: KailuaBoy who wrote (24666)8/15/2000 3:14:18 PM
From: ahhaha  Respond to of 29970
 
No, they just take responsibility (which means absolutely nothing but sounds good. Sounding good is everything and is close to looking good).