Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (20048)	8/15/2000 10:16:47 PM
From: BWAC	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21342

1.) Point out the items on the balance sheet that are UUUUUGHLY? It certainly isn't long term debt? That is a very clean balance sheet. 2.) No WSTL did not make 6 cents in earnings. They did make 6 cents from ongoing operations when all one time items were factored in. (Just like with any other company's earnings) You are making an issue where there is none. Nothing out of the ordinary as you would have people believe. Do you always practice to deceive in such a manner? You know it could give brokers a bad name to do that stuff? 3.) Notes to financials are not very interesting reading. They contain a lot of basic statements that seek to cover all possibilities and point out associated risks. They are usually negative by nature. WSTL's are nothing out of the ordinary. Again you drop innuendoes and hints at unpredictable looming disasters. Why is this? Are you here to try and prey upon novice investors who may not fully understand? Again that could give brokers all around a bad name? How is it that a professional such as yourself cannot discuss and fully explain your thesis of impending doom on WSTL? Why is it that a professional such as yourself is here trying to stir fear among the individual investors? Why is it that a professional such as yourself provides no relevant facts to support your sky is falling statements?