Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (11347)	8/16/2000 10:48:25 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Don't know if you saw this already, but George W. supports getting rid of Saddam Hussein. He also supports the US unilaterally developing a missile defense system, which, of course, when perfected, would probably be sold to Israel. These are the reasons I think Gore would be more attractive to Islamic interests. Further, the Clinton administration has been more supportive of the Palestinians than any other administration, inviting Arafat to the White House, for example. washingtonpost.com

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (11347)	8/16/2000 12:08:43 PM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Heinz, here is a story about Al Gore Sr. and Jr. and their ties to Occidental pretroleum fairfieldweekly.com This rag leans heavily to the left so i was suprised by their objectivity. They used to rag on Bush Sr for being born with a silver spoon but failed to credit him for not using his "priveledged" position to avoid combat in WWII - he could have sat behind a typewriter -g- Thanks for your contributions - you are a major asset to the SI . mike