SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Hayden who wrote (8039)8/16/2000 9:54:12 PM
From: Rob Preuss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Jeff,

Moore's Law relates to the information processing capacity
of a chip. This capacity is proportional to the number of
transistors on the chip as well as to the speed of the chip.
If the total area of the chip is held constant, then the
number of transistors on the chip is inversely proportional
to the area of a transistor.

Thus, I think Moore's Law has two components:

1. The rate at which the transistor area decreases.

2. The rate at which the switching speed increases.

For example, if the transistor area drops in half every
36 months and the speed doubles every 36 months you get
a 4x information processing improvement every 36 months
or, equivalently, a doubling every 18 months.

I'm told that the real numbers these days are closer
to a halving of the transistor area every 24 months
and a doubling of the speed every 24 months... thus
one gets a doubling of the information processing
performance every 12 months.

Anyway, I don't think the speed component applies to
your pixel argument... only the area component. Thus
one would expect to see a doubling of the resolution
(with no change in chip size or cost) every 36 months
(or 24 months, depending on who you choose to believe).

So I agree with the general gist of your argument,
but I'd refine it just a little bit by omitting
the speed component of Moore's Law.

Cheers,

Rob