Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbe who wrote (85571)	8/16/2000 2:27:14 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

In the July Scientific American, there is evidence that there were more subatomic particles than our current theories predict as evidenced by the texture in the 4 deg K background radiation. This was 300,000 years AB (After Bang). I hate when I get quarks in my proto-universe. If they polled me, I'd vote to change the Christian calendar into a universal calendar with the Big Bang at year 0. This eliminates the need for "before" dates. We have to figure out a more reasonable way to write it otherwise we'll all be sounding like Capt. Kirk. The basic unit would be the Planck time. And all with built in Pauli Exclusion excuses. Honey, I'll be mostly home in 5 x 10e49 Plancks. Sorry, I couldn't wash the dishes : it was a disallowed state, Dear.