SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank who wrote (71041)8/16/2000 5:46:20 PM
From: Now Shes Blonde  Respond to of 95453
 
For those of you who may be interested, this "talk" between 2 NG futures traders on
the direction of NG prices and why. I find it interesting, if you don't,
sorry for the noise.
As usual, 99.99% of my post is cut and past; this taken from a NG futures
trading email list.

Post 1:
OK! Let's talk books! As the proud owner of the Oct-Jan spread, I'm
thinking to myself, "I'm golden because this spread wins either way."
Obviously, I have accumulated them for the reason (among others) that I
humbly believe that all of the supply shortage hype is bullshit, a subject
about which I know a lot (the bullshit part).

On the other hand, suppose I'm wrong. If it is not bullshit, the problem is
not in September and October, eh? It is in January and February. So, if
this market does believe it's own bullshit, than can someone in this
enlightend group axplain to me why JAN and FEB are trading at 12-15 cent
premiums to the front, instead of at $5.00?

Hmmmmmm........

Response to pos 1:
Scott asks, "why Jan and Feb are trading at 12-15 cent premiums to the
front, instead of $5.00?....."

The answer, I am told by utility buyers is, "We can't justify paying $4.55
for Dec natural gas in the calendar month of August "at this point in time"
(apologies to the Watergate hearings...) to our PUCs..."

This means that, if the NWS comes out in mid to late Oct and says,
"Uh...gonna be a normal winter", then the utilities can JUSTIFY paying more
for NG at that time.

If the NWS comes out and says, "Uh..ain't gonn be no winter (like last
year), price drops and utility buyers look like members of Mensa.

(Note: I missed getting admitted to Mensa by just one point! They said,
"point is, Rando, you're just not smart enough!") Badda-bing! But I
digress...

Reason # 2: The quants of the industry won't allow their trade staff to
sell the fronts and buy the backs untill the volatility drops at the front
of the curve and rises at the back (winter) part of the curve. Sep
volatility is higher than Dec or Jan volatility. Simple math then dictates
"buy the front, sell the back." Thus, members of the Storage Trading
Tribe" got voted off the Island of Gaseousness" last April, never to be seen
this year.

So, IMHO, there is no political or economical reason to pay up for winter
gas until Old Person Winter shows up and causes your tongue to stick to the
flagpole in front of the Natural Gas Trader's Hall of Fame.

At least, that's what will be said in the Senate Hearings on the Winter of
'00-'01 next summer.
**********************
EDIT
My hope is for an earlier then normal cold snap to throw a wrench into the system. If that happens I hope these guys will be thinking a colder than normal winter is coming.