Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (107653)	8/16/2000 11:32:39 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Intel is very good at paper launches. While AMD is delivering the goods." ...Pardon? The PIII at 866MHZ and slower can be run as warm as 80 degrees. To hit 933MHZ it must be limited to 75 degrees. At 1GHZ it must be cooled to 70 degrees. It won't run 1.13 GHZ unless cooled to 62 degrees or lower. It looks to me like Intel is stuck at 933MHZ. All socketed AMD CPUs, at all speeds, can run at 90 degrees. Cool down an AMD 950, as bunny has shown, and it will run at 1.36GHZ using only FSB overclocking. Intel made a big deal about the C0 stepping letting them catch up to AMD and they paper launched the 1.13GHZ part to "prove" it. The reality, I think, is that Intel is in very big trouble. AMD is yielding volume at speeds 20% faster than anything Intel can realistically ship. That's roughly the advantage Intel had over AMD last spring when they nearly put AMD out of business. The majority of the profits in the CPU business come from the top 10 to 20 percent of the market. AMD has sufficient capacity to supply that entire market. Intel will certainly maintain a decent market share through sheer momentum for some time, but given their expenses, 50% of the high end is just not enough. AMD is going to be making a lot of money in the coming months. Intel will too, but it may be quite a bit less than they used to make. Dan