SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gpowell who wrote (24731)8/16/2000 11:40:44 PM
From: E. Davies  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 29970
 
Nice data. Thanks for the effort.

You do understand of course that a critical part of why AOL has been able to grow at an exponential pace is because they have a trivially simple self install process.

You "forgot" to extend out the line as to what happens if ATHM keeps growing at only 300k/quarter.

Instead of 3M projected for 2000 you get 2.4
Instead of 6M projected for 2001 you get 3.6
Instead of 10M projected for 2002 you get 4.8
Instead of your projection of 20Million for quarter #33 you get 9 million

Gee- 9 million subscribers in 2007! less than 1/2 the size AOL is now. I'd sure be willing to pay $6 billion for that now. Well- maybe not.

And another thing- what do you think the "other" 11 million subscribers that would have signed up with @home will do? Go somewhere else of course. Not delayed- lost forever.

In reality of course manual install would be able to ramp to maybe 500k/quarter in a year or two. Do the math-it's still far below projections and @home would always be second tier.

Not my vision. In my vision @home is the premier internet service in the entire world. They replace AOL.

Of course having given up the rest of the world to "Excite Chello" might have blown that vision already.

Eric



To: gpowell who wrote (24731)8/17/2000 12:30:44 AM
From: Orcastraiter  Respond to of 29970
 
Bottom line, as far a subscriber rates are concerned there is no need to panic.

You mean projected subscriber rates ;^)

Certainly management has compared their sub growth curve to AOL's too. They know that they need to perform at that same level to be taken seriously. So far they have done well. What I'm wondering is were their sub projections conditioned by AOL's performance? And can they live up to their projections?

Orca