SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Broadcom (BRCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (4147)8/17/2000 12:13:29 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6531
 
OT: GAAP, it's not your father's economy any more....

Hi mindmeld,

Re: To be honest with you I think pooling makes a lot of sense in the tech industry where technologies go obsolete in a couple years, but most accountants think purchase method is closer to the truth - whatever the hell truth is. :)

Without a doubt, the FASB's penchant for viewing life in a rear-view mirror is not serving companies or investors well. If it were up to them, we'd still be depreciating ISDN equipment, 4ESSs, and Windows 3.1 installations. Come to think of it, we are. <g>

My view is that the pace of technological change will only accelerate for the foreseeable future, and GAAP, a system that was designed to capture data points in an rapidly vanishing industrial economy, will become increasingly irrelevant and misleading as innovation and service industries come to fore in the future.

I've read the work of sell-side analysts disparaging the pooling-of-interests method and largely, it seems to be sour grapes over companies, best exemplified by CSCO, which are gobbling up promising startups at a furious pace, and are thus depriving the analysts and their underwriter brethern across the corporate (and illusory) Maginot Line of their proper rewards for bringing these bright new jewels out in the debutante ball called the IPO. Is the ending of pooling-of-interest accounting merely a case of jealousy? A case could be made for this argument, IMHO.

Best, Ray



To: RetiredNow who wrote (4147)8/18/2000 11:27:39 AM
From: Boca_PETE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6531
 
mindmeld: Regarding "pooling of interest" accounting, new FASB rules throw a bone to the techies by requiring disclosure of earnings and per share figures both before and after "Goodwill Amortization" so that analysts can exclude such amortization if they see it as an extraordinary item.

I believe that approval of the new FASB rule has been deferred to 2001 first quarter. Any pooling mergers announced prior to such approval would still be permitted to be accounted for under the old rules.

FYI, I believe that the USA is the only country in the world that still permits "pooling of interest" accounting for mergers.

Aside from the practical benefits of not penalizing future earnings with goodwill amortization charges over the next 20 years, doesn't it seem strange to buy a company in exchange for shares of high value, and not record that investment at the value paid ? Sure does to me - maybe I'm missing something :-)

P