Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (29682)	8/17/2000 8:09:01 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

He was also a close friend of Cardinal O'Connor. edit: he's an honest "liberal" because he's really a libertarian. <gg>

To: Neocon who wrote (29682)	8/17/2000 8:25:11 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

The definition of the extremist pro-abortion position - Al Gore's And when Republicans left their abortion plank unchanged, you saw noses wrinkle and brows furrow. "They wanted it only in the unreconstructed view: We are against abortion, period, no other point of view will be tolerated," suggested NBC's Tom Brokaw. On ABC's "Good Morning America," Charles Gibson asked Lynne Cheney whether the Republicans were "really an open, compassionate, tolerant party." On CNN, Wolf Blitzer asked Sen. Bill Frist (R., Tenn.) about "that very, very strong, total, against-all-odds, abortion provision." These are fair questions. But they are unfairly asked of only one party. Does anyone even know the Democratic plank on abortion? As ratified this week, the 2000 platform asserts that "the Democratic Party stands behind the right of every woman to choice, consistent with Roe v. Wade, and regardless of ability to pay." Translation: taxpayer-funded abortion on demand. Is there a more extreme pro-choice position? interactive.wsj.com