SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mama Bear who wrote (5680)8/17/2000 11:05:30 AM
From: sommovigo  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 19428
 
MamaBear,

I know that you have followed Elgindy for some time. I'll give you an example of Elgindy in action:

Anthony Elgindy was quoted as saying in a Wired magazine article of April/2000,

"Wall Street is the most manipulated scam and corrupt marketplace on the earth right now..."

However, as a contrasting comment, the author of the article had this to say about Elgindy (and short-sellers in general):

"...the fact is that Anthony isn't really competing against the market makers. Instead, he's picking his profits from the pockets of the legion of small-time plungers."

The same Wired magazine article had this to say about the online short-selling guru:

Two hundred and fifty amateurs pay $600 a month to follow Anthony's trades. When [Anthony] moves, they move...

Within minutes, the 250 traders ... respond to his burst of lyricism with collective action.

This is a TACIT example of manipulation by means of contemporaneous shorting - textbook, IMHO. Read Section 9 - this is EXACTLY what is being described in Section 9 as price manipulation. Sorry, Barb - all of your fantasies about my interest in facts - unsubstantiated. Here I have given a very specific and useful example to you of what it means to manipulate price as described in parts of Section 9 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Will you be counted amongst those who shorted contemporaneously against CYBR or ARIA or any other stock Elgindy or Auric recommended a short-attack on?

Yes, short-attack. What was described in the Wired magazine of April, 2000 was a TEXTBOOK SHORT ATACK, and it's not legal.

If you are one of the posse piling on to short a stock, you may be guilty of fraud.